You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For context, some time ago I posted a proposal on how to improve the Code of Conduct we already have.
However, for the improvements to take presence, I want to make sure that people responsible for enforcing them do agree with them.
As far as I can see, the current revision mentions Robbie's email address at the redhat.com domain:
Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at rharwood AT redhat DOT com.
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
reporter of any incident.
Therefore, I can sense that there were some layoffs going on and that email address, which resides in the actual document, is no longer applicable.
Since I'd like to confirm with the Code of Conduct enforcement team that they will be fine with the changes I want to introduce, I'd like to contact them for clarification.
The last time I tried pinging Robbie here or chatting about heavy metal music on IRC, I got no response. I don't understand, why that is, but considering this, I'm unsure if sending a GPG-encrypted email or commenting on their Mastodon profile would do the job as well.
Therefore, the questions that arise from this meta issue, before me attempting to add document improvements, are:
How do I directly contact the Code of Conduct enforcement team (here: for issues other than reporting unacceptable behavior)?
Is Robbie still the one in charge of enforcement?
Is their redhat.com email address valid?
If not, who shall be in charge and what email address should be present in the document?
I'm assigning this one to the people from the committee who have been there long enough to know the best, how to resolve it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
aronowski
added
the
meta
Not a review request, but an issue or notice wrt the signing process
label
Oct 24, 2023
For context, some time ago I posted a proposal on how to improve the Code of Conduct we already have.
However, for the improvements to take presence, I want to make sure that people responsible for enforcing them do agree with them.
As far as I can see, the current revision mentions Robbie's email address at the
redhat.com
domain:While I don't know, what was happening inside Red Hat, Inc., because I was never employed there, I can see Robbie having a personal email address on their profile, as well as a hiring availability reference.
Therefore, I can sense that there were some layoffs going on and that email address, which resides in the actual document, is no longer applicable.
Since I'd like to confirm with the Code of Conduct enforcement team that they will be fine with the changes I want to introduce, I'd like to contact them for clarification.
The last time I tried pinging Robbie here or chatting about heavy metal music on IRC, I got no response. I don't understand, why that is, but considering this, I'm unsure if sending a GPG-encrypted email or commenting on their Mastodon profile would do the job as well.
Therefore, the questions that arise from this meta issue, before me attempting to add document improvements, are:
redhat.com
email address valid?I'm assigning this one to the people from the committee who have been there long enough to know the best, how to resolve it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: