-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Too big dbx
causes Shim to refuse to boot, presumably due to "failure" from tpm2->hash_log_extend_event()
#654
Comments
I think the thing to do here is:
|
kukrimate
added a commit
to kukrimate/mallory
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2024
The extend operation still occurs even if `*_log_extend_event` returns EFI_VOLUME_FULL. Let's print a warning when we first see this error code, but otherwise continue booting. Bailing on this condition has caused machines with limited event log space to become unbootable with TPM 2.0 enabled. (fixes rhboot#654) Signed-off-by: Mate Kukri <[email protected]>
kukrimate
added a commit
to kukrimate/mallory
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2024
The extend operation still occurs even if `*_log_extend_event` returns EFI_VOLUME_FULL. Let's print a warning when we first see this error code, but otherwise continue booting. Bailing on this condition has caused machines with limited event log space to become unbootable with TPM 2.0 enabled. (fixes rhboot#654) Signed-off-by: Mate Kukri <[email protected]>
kukrimate
added a commit
to kukrimate/mallory
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2024
The extend operation still occurs even if `*_log_extend_event` returns EFI_VOLUME_FULL. Let's print a warning when we first see this error code, but otherwise continue booting. Bailing on this condition has caused machines with limited event log space to become unbootable with TPM 2.0 enabled. (fixes rhboot#654) Signed-off-by: Mate Kukri <[email protected]>
Any update here? I've encountered the same error on a SuperMicro X11SSH-F board with Fedora 41. After a TPM module installed, it refused to boot with the same error:
If I remove the dbx keys from BIOS setup, it boots successfully. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
On my ASUS Transformer Mini T103HAF [1], applying a too big dbx update from e.g. Ubuntu 24.04 beta live CD can cause Shim to refuse too boot, citing "Volume Full" despite plenty of space reported from
efivars
filesystem on Linux. Upon further investigation, this "Volume Full" error probably comes fromtpm2->hash_log_extend_event()
, as I'll demonstrate below.Step to reproduce:
15.8-0ubuntu1
and asecureboot-db
which "Update dbx to 2023-05-09 release".efivars
isn't close to full.But we've just established that
efivars
isn't even close to full. So what gives?4. Now disable Secure Boot, modify the boot image on the USB drive so that it boots Grub directly instead, and boot the image again. After that, enable Shim verbose mode by running
sudo mokutil --set-verbosity true
.5. Modify the boot image again so that it will load Shim. Boots off that. This time, you'll find the log that says:
Or:
The full log is available in the picture form at [3] (since I don't know how to collect the log otherwise).
Here comes my analysis: both
tpm_measure_variable()
andtpm_log_event()
callstpm_log_event_raw()
which in turns calltpm2->hash_log_extend_event()
. Now, the TCG EFI Protocol Specification family 2.0 [4] section 6.6.6 specifiesEFI_VOLUME_FULL
as one of the possible error ofEFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent
, describing it as "The extend operation occurred, but the event could not be written to one or more event logs". So, what I assume happens is that the full content ofdbx
are included into this event log, which consumes so much space it can't log any other variable, henceEFI_VOLUME_FULL
"failure".Now, the reason I put "failure" in quote is because 1.) the extend operation still occurs, and 2.) go-attestation mentions in one of their vulnerability disclosure [5] that "The TCG noted that event data is meant for debugging". So, I think this error from
tpm2->hash_log_extend_event()
could be considered non-fatal?Note that before I come to this conclusion, I've reported this issue to Ubuntu before as [6].
[1] Additional information about my device:
Make & model: ASUS Transformer Mini T103HAF
Firmware (BIOS) make & version: American Megatrends Inc. T103HAF.309, 22/4/2019
TPM manufacturer: INTC
TPM manufacturer version: 2.0.5.3015
TPM specification version: 2.0
[2] https://releases.ubuntu.com/noble/ubuntu-24.04-beta-desktop-amd64.iso
[3] https://ibb.co/album/RzXY28 (sorry for low quality. And note that this is actually collected from Fedora 39 KDE spin live image, which seems to include Shim 5.16.)
[4] https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/EFI-Protocol-Specification-rev13-160330final.pdf
[5] https://github.com/google/go-attestation/blob/master/docs/event-log-disclosure.md#vulnerability-report-and-outcome
[6] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/secureboot-db/+bug/2061551
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: