We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
introduce syntactic sugar to make the hamjest code look more like jest code.
__.expect(5).toBe(__.greaterThan(4))
would be equivalent to __.assertThat(5, __.greaterThan(4))
__.assertThat(5, __.greaterThan(4))
if this would help people familiar with the "jest syntax" unleash the power of the hamcrest style, i would be happy to try and implement this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the suggestion. Sure, give it a try! I welcome such PRs.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
introduce syntactic sugar to make the hamjest code look more like jest code.
__.expect(5).toBe(__.greaterThan(4))
would be equivalent to
__.assertThat(5, __.greaterThan(4))
if this would help people familiar with the "jest syntax" unleash the power of the hamcrest style, i would be happy to try and implement this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: