We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
data("TVbo", package="lmerTest") > fm <- lmer(Coloursaturation ~ TVset*Picture + + (-1 + TVset|Assessor), data=TVbo) > lmerTest:::rand(fm) # bug Error in parse(text = x, keep.source = FALSE) : <text>:2:0: unexpected end of input 1: Coloursaturation~-1+TVset - ^
This notation seems to test the entire RE-term despite fm and fm2 being identical:
fm
fm2
> fm2 <- lmer(Coloursaturation ~ TVset*Picture + + (0 + TVset|Assessor), data=TVbo) > fm3 <- lm(Coloursaturation ~ TVset*Picture, data=TVbo) > lmerTest:::rand(fm2) Analysis of Random effects Table: Chi.sq Chi.DF p.value TVset:Assessor 64.3 1 1e-15 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > -2*c(logLik(fm2, REML=TRUE) - logLik(fm3, REML=TRUE)) [1] -64.30212 > anova(fm, fm2) refitting model(s) with ML (instead of REML) Data: TVbo Models: object: Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (-1 + TVset | Assessor) ..1: Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (0 + TVset | Assessor) Df AIC BIC logLik deviance Chisq Chi Df Pr(>Chisq) object 19 590.88 652.77 -276.44 552.88 ..1 19 590.88 652.77 -276.44 552.88 0 0 1
Test is incorrectly labelled:
> fm4 <- lmer(Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (TVset | Assessor), data=TVbo) > fm5 <- lmer(Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (1 | Assessor), data=TVbo) > anova(fm4, fm5, refit=FALSE) Data: TVbo Models: ..1: Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (1 | Assessor) object: Coloursaturation ~ TVset * Picture + (TVset | Assessor) Df AIC BIC logLik deviance Chisq Chi Df Pr(>Chisq) ..1 14 633.22 678.83 -302.61 605.22 object 19 598.17 660.06 -280.09 560.17 45.048 5 1.418e-08 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > lmerTest:::rand(fm4) # wrong test!!!! Analysis of Random effects Table: Chi.sq Chi.DF p.value TVset:Assessor 45 5 1e-08 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Also note that fm, fm2 and fm4 are just reparameterizations of the same model.
fm4
rand() fails to throw an error when models (of which one is lm) are fitted in different datasets due to missing values:
rand()
lm
> m <- lmer(Preference ~ sens2 + Homesize + (1 |Consumer:Income), data=carrots) > lmerTest:::rand(m) Analysis of Random effects Table: Chi.sq Chi.DF p.value Consumer:Income 51.9 1 6e-13 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > m2 <- lm(Preference ~ sens2 + Homesize, data=carrots) > nrow(model.frame(m)) [1] 1161 > nrow(model.frame(m2)) [1] 1233
Unable to handle models without parentheses around random terms:
> fm <- lmer(Reaction ~ 1 + Days|Subject, sleepstudy) > lmerTest:::rand(fm) ## Bug in lmerTest::rand Error: Invalid grouping factor specification, Subject - (1 + Days | Subject) + (1 | Subject) In addition: There were 12 warnings (use warnings() to see them)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This notation seems to test the entire RE-term despite
fm
andfm2
being identical:Test is incorrectly labelled:
Also note that
fm
,fm2
andfm4
are just reparameterizations of the same model.rand()
fails to throw an error when models (of which one islm
) are fitted in different datasets due to missing values:Unable to handle models without parentheses around random terms:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: