Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to ruleset which can then be applied to invidual apps #731

Closed
Rexadev opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Add option to ruleset which can then be applied to invidual apps #731

Rexadev opened this issue Jul 7, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
stale ATTRIBUTE: this issue has not had recent activity suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements unlisted ATTRIBUTE: this issue will not be listed in-app, such as among search results

Comments

@Rexadev
Copy link

Rexadev commented Jul 7, 2022

Like if create a rule for browser

Allow 80 , 433 TCP and UDP
Deny all other

I should be able to apply it to other apps without having to config all again

@dhaavi That is more messy than my Idea. Because user can't name and store a ruleset and has to remember what rule is applied to which app.

@Rexadev Rexadev added the suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements label Jul 7, 2022
@ghost ghost assigned dhaavi and ghost Jul 8, 2022
@dhaavi
Copy link
Member

dhaavi commented Jul 13, 2022

We are thinking about being able to export and import single settings. Assigning @ppacher.

@Rexadev
Copy link
Author

Rexadev commented Aug 18, 2022

@dhaavi That is more messy than my Idea. Because user can't name and store a ruleset and has to remember what rule is applied to which app.
Example - I create a ruleset named Only Port 443 that does what is says and I apply it to some of my apps. Then later I should be able to edit the ruleset and Make the rule Only Allow Port 443 and 80.

@ppacher
Copy link
Contributor

ppacher commented Aug 22, 2022

Hi @Rexadev,

the possibility to have named rulesets that can be applied to apps is a nice thing to have. We already have a different concept in the backlog which will solve this use-case as well, but for the time being a simple import/export will be the first step as it's easier to do with limited resources and a pretty long backlog :)

@dhaavi dhaavi added the unlisted ATTRIBUTE: this issue will not be listed in-app, such as among search results label Sep 26, 2022
@Rexadev
Copy link
Author

Rexadev commented May 30, 2023

@dhaavi reconsider its priority please

@Raphty Raphty unassigned ppacher and dhaavi Oct 6, 2023
@Raphty Raphty added the stale ATTRIBUTE: this issue has not had recent activity label Oct 6, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

If the issue has not been resolved, you can find more information in our Wiki or continue the conversation on our Discord.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale ATTRIBUTE: this issue has not had recent activity suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements unlisted ATTRIBUTE: this issue will not be listed in-app, such as among search results
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants