Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle multi-state models #6

Open
shruthivis opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Handle multi-state models #6

shruthivis opened this issue Apr 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@shruthivis
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure the code can handle multi-state models currently

@saltzberg saltzberg self-assigned this Jan 23, 2020
@saltzberg
Copy link

Multi-state models are not currently handled correctly as the coordinates from all states are "flattened" into a single set. Thus, superposition is incorrect since each state has a different frame of reference.

To fix this, the coordinates from each state should be separated. Currently, model coordinates, after being read from the input RMFs, are stored as a large numpy array (conform). Propose changing conform (along with masses, radii and ps_names) to a dictionary with keys corresponding to the state_indexes identified in the RMF file(s).

Output will then include central models and localization densities for each state in every cluster.

Cluster precision will need to be defined as some aggregation of the precision from each state (sum? average? weighted average?).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants