-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
s13-01-field-research-what-is-it-and-.html
149 lines (132 loc) · 20.6 KB
/
s13-01-field-research-what-is-it-and-.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<link href="shared/bookhub.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<title>Field Research: What Is It and When to Use It?</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id=navbar-top class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s13-00-field-research-a-qualitative-t.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s13-00-field-research-a-qualitative-t.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
<div id="book-content">
<div class="section" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01" condition="start-of-chunk" version="5.0" lang="en">
<h2 class="title editable block">
<span class="title-prefix">10.1</span> Field Research: What Is It and When to Use It?</h2>
<div class="learning_objectives editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_n01">
<h3 class="title">Learning Objectives</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_l01">
<li>Define field research.</li>
<li>Define participant observation and describe the continuum of participant observation.</li>
<li>Discuss at least two examples of field research.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p01">There’s a <em class="emphasis">New Yorker</em> cartoon that pretty accurately portrays life for a field researcher (Cotham, 2003).<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_002">Cotham, F. (2003, September 1). Two barbarians and a professor of barbarian studies. <em class="emphasis">The New Yorker</em>. Retrieved from <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.cartoonbank.com/2003/two-barbarians-and-a-professor-of-barbarian-studies/invt/126562">http://www.cartoonbank.com/2003/two-barbarians-and-a-professor-of-barbarian-studies/invt/126562</a></span> It depicts “Two Barbarians and a Professor of Barbarian Studies.” As field researchers, just as in the cartoon, we immerse ourselves in the settings that we study. While the extent to which we immerse ourselves varies (note in the cartoon the professor is riding a horse but has chosen to retain his professorial jacket and pipe), what all field researchers have in common is their participation in “the field.”</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p02"><span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">Field research</a><span class="glossdef">A qualitative method of data collection that involves observing, interacting with, and interviewing people in their natural settings.</span></span> is a qualitative method of data collection aimed at understanding, observing, and interacting with people in their natural settings. Thus when social scientists talk about being in “the field,” they’re talking about being out in the real world and involved in the everyday lives of the people they are studying. Sometimes researchers use the terms <em class="emphasis">ethnography</em> or <em class="emphasis">participant observation</em> to refer to this method of data collection; the former is most commonly used in anthropology, while the latter is used commonly in sociology. In this text, we’ll use two main terms: <em class="emphasis">field research</em> and <em class="emphasis">participant observation</em>. You might think of field research as an umbrella term that includes the myriad activities that field researchers engage in when they collect data: they participate, they observe, they usually interview some of the people they observe, and they typically analyze documents or artifacts created by the people they observe.</p>
<div class="figure large editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_f01">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Figure 10.2</span> </p>
<img src="section_13/9f6caf32e910106b1721f3408784f2c5.jpg">
<p class="para">Field research typically involves a combination of participant observation, interviewing, and document or artifact analysis. This chapter focuses primarily on participant observation.</p>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p03">Because we cover interviews and document/artifact analysis in <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch09#blackstone_1.0-ch09">Chapter 9 "Interviews: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches"</a> and <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch11#blackstone_1.0-ch11">Chapter 11 "Unobtrusive Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches"</a>, here we’ll focus only on the participation and observation aspects of field research. These aspects of field research are usually referenced together and are known as <span class="margin_term"><a class="glossterm">participant observation</a><span class="glossdef">The parts of field research that involve spending time with and watching one’s research participants; interviewing and document/artifact analysis are the other two components of field research.</span></span>. Like field research, participant observation also has multiple meanings. Researchers conducting participant observation vary in the extent to which they participate or observe (Junker, 1960).<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_003">Junker, B. H. (1960). <em class="emphasis">Field work: An introduction to the social sciences</em>. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.</span> You might say that there’s a continuum of participant observation, where complete observation lies at end of the continuum and complete participation lies at the other end.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p04">In other chapters, we discuss two works that could fall on either end of the participant observation continuum. Barrie Thorne’s (1993)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_004">Thorne, B. (1993). <em class="emphasis">Gender play: Girls and boys in school</em>. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.</span> observations of children in classrooms, school cafeterias, hallways, and playgrounds rest near the complete observation end of the continuum. Rather than actually pretending to be an elementary school student and interacting with her research participants as they would each other, Thorne observed (which, as discussed in <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch04#blackstone_1.0-ch04">Chapter 4 "Beginning a Research Project"</a>, was probably a wise move since it would have been difficult to convince the students that she was one of them). Laud Humphreys’s (1970)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_005">Humphreys, L. (1970). <em class="emphasis">Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places</em>. London, UK: Duckworth.</span> research on the tearoom trade, described in <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch03#blackstone_1.0-ch03">Chapter 3 "Research Ethics"</a>, could be said to rest on the other end of the continuum. Rather than <em class="emphasis">only</em> observe, Humphreys played the key tearoom role of watch queen, a role that nonresearcher participants in the trade also played. Humphreys also did not tell many of the people he observed that he was a researcher; thus from the perspectives of many of his “subjects,” he was <em class="emphasis">only</em> a participant. The participant observation continuum is represented in <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_f02">Figure 10.3</a>.</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p05">There are pros and cons associated with both aspects of the participant observer’s role. Complete observers may miss important aspects of group interaction and don’t have the opportunity to <em class="emphasis">fully</em> grasp what life is like for the people they observe. At the same time, sitting back and observing may grant them opportunities to see interactions that they would miss were they more involved. Complete participation has the benefit of allowing researchers a real taste of life in the group that they study. Some argue that participation is the only way to understand what it is that we investigate. On the other hand, complete participants may find themselves in situations that they’d rather not face but cannot excuse themselves from <em class="emphasis">because</em> they’ve adopted the role of complete participant. Also, complete participants who do not reveal themselves as researchers must face the ethical quandary of possibly deceiving their “subjects.” In reality, most field research projects lie somewhere near the middle of the observer-participant continuum. Field researchers typically participate to at least some extent in their field sites, but there are also times when they may just observe. Where would <em class="emphasis">you</em> feel most comfortable as a field researcher—as an observer, a participant, or a bit of both?</p>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p06">As you might have imagined based on the examples of Thorne’s and Humphreys’s work, field research is well equipped to answer “how” kinds of questions. Whereas survey researchers often aim to answer “why” questions, field researchers ask <em class="emphasis">how</em> the processes they study occur, <em class="emphasis">how</em> the people they spend time with in the field interact, and <em class="emphasis">how</em> events unfold. <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_t01">Table 10.1 "Field Research Examples"</a> presents just a few examples of the kinds of questions field researchers have asked in past projects along with a brief summary of where and what role those researchers took in the field. The examples presented in <a class="xref" href="#blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_t01">Table 10.1 "Field Research Examples"</a> by no means represent an exhaustive list of the variations of questions field researchers have asked or of the range of field research projects that have been conducted over the years, but they do provide a snapshot of the kinds of work sociological field researchers engage in.</p>
<div class="table block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_t01" frame="all">
<p class="title"><span class="title-prefix">Table 10.1</span> Field Research Examples</p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Question</th>
<th>Researcher role</th>
<th>Author (year)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>How is the social structure of a local “slum” organized?</td>
<td>Over 3 years of participation and observations among an Italian community in Boston’s North End</td>
<td>Whyte (1942)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_006">William Foote Whyte is considered by many to be the pioneer of the use of participant observation methods in sociological studies. Whyte, W. F. (1942). <em class="emphasis">Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum</em>. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>How do the urban poor live?</td>
<td>Twenty months of participation and observations among an African American community in Washington, DC</td>
<td>Liebow (1967)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_007">Liebow, E. (1967). <em class="emphasis">Tally’s corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men</em>. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Why and how do workers consent to their own exploitation?</td>
<td>Ten months of participation as a machine operator in a Chicago factory along with observations of workers in the factory</td>
<td>Burawoy (1979)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_008">Burawoy, M. (1979). <em class="emphasis">Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism</em>. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>How is erotic labor organized in two different countries, and what are sex workers’ experiences in each?</td>
<td>Brief participation in sex transactions in the Netherlands and California along with observations of and interviews with sex workers in both locations</td>
<td>Chapkis (1997)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_009">Chapkis, W. (1997). <em class="emphasis">Live sex acts: Women performing erotic labor</em>. New York, NY: Routledge.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>How does childrearing differ across social classes?</td>
<td>Approximately one month each participating and observing in the homes and lives of 12 different families</td>
<td>Lareau (2003)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_010">Lareau, A. (2003). <em class="emphasis">Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life</em>. Berkeley: University of California Press.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>How is masculinity constructed by and among high school students, and what does this mean for our understandings of gender and sexuality?</td>
<td>Eighteen months of observations and interviews in a racially diverse working-class high school</td>
<td>Pascoe (2007)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_011">Pascoe, C. J. (2007). <em class="emphasis">Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school</em>. Berkeley: University of California Press.</span>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>How do sports play a role in shaping gender, class, family, and community?</td>
<td>Participation as a youth soccer volunteer along with observations and interviews</td>
<td>Messner (2009)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_012">Messner, M. (2009). <em class="emphasis">It’s all for the kids: Gender, families, and youth sports</em>. Berkeley: University of California Press.</span>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p class="para editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_p07">Field research is a method that was originally crafted by anthropologists for the purpose of cultural understanding and interpretation (Wolcott, 2008).<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_013">Wolcott, H. F. (2008). <em class="emphasis">Ethnography: A way of seeing</em> (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.</span> Dissatisfied with studying groups of people based solely on secondhand accounts and inspection of artifacts, several anthropologists decided to try living in or near the communities they studied to learn from and about them. Two anthropologists in particular, Franz Boas (1888)<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_014">Boas, F. (1888). <em class="emphasis">The central Eskimo</em>. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology.</span> and Bronislaw Malinowski (1922),<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_015">Malinowski, B. (1922). <em class="emphasis">Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea</em>. London, UK: G. Routledge & Sons; New York, NY: E. P. Dutton.</span> are credited with developing this method around the turn of the 20th century. Boas lived with native populations in Canada and in the American Northwest. Malinowski lived in Papua New Guinea with people who were native to the area. Sociologists picked up on the idea and on the benefits of field research (which we’ll examine in <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s02#blackstone_1.0-ch10_s02">Section 10.2 "Pros and Cons of Field Research"</a>). Soon a number of sociologists had embraced this new method and adapted field research for their own studies of groups. Many of the early field researchers in sociology were former social workers who got interested in sociological research because of experiences in their roles as social reformers. The University of Chicago in particular played a key role in the development of American field research through, among other projects, its involvement in Hull House,<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_016">Jane Addams Hull House Association. Retrieved from <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.hullhouse.org">http://www.hullhouse.org</a></span> a social settlement founded for European immigrants in Chicago (Deegan, 1986).<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_017">Deegan, M. J. (1986). <em class="emphasis">Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918</em>. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.</span></p>
<div class="key_takeaways editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_n02">
<h3 class="title">Key Takeaways</h3>
<ul class="itemizedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_l02">
<li>Field research typically involves a combination of participant observation, interviewing, and document or artifact analysis.</li>
<li>Different participant observation projects rest in different places on the continuum of complete observer to complete participant; most lie near the middle of the continuum.</li>
<li>Field research has its origins in anthropology.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="exercises editable block" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_n03">
<h3 class="title">Exercises</h3>
<ol class="orderedlist" id="blackstone_1.0-ch10_s01_l03">
<li>As a preview to some of the pros, cons, joys, and frustrations of doing field research, watch the following clip, which shows “news” personality Stephen Colbert interviewing sociologist Sudhir Venkatesh<span class="footnote" id="blackstone_1.0-fn10_018">Venkatesh’s work was introduced in <a class="xref" href="blackstone_1.0-ch02#blackstone_1.0-ch02">Chapter 2 "Linking Methods With Theory"</a>, the chapter on linking methods with theory.</span> about his field research in some of Chicago’s poorest neighborhoods: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/156631/march-13-2008/sudhir-venkatesh">http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/156631/march-13-2008/sudhir-venkatesh</a>. The clip highlights some of the advantages field research has over survey interviewing; it also highlights some of the disadvantages of field research. Based on what you see in the clip, what are some of the main advantages of field research as compared to survey interviewing? What are some of the main disadvantages?</li>
<li>If you would like to learn more about William Foote Whyte’s groundbreaking field research, a 40-minute interview with Whyte and several of his research participants, conducted nearly 40 years after the publication of <em class="emphasis">Street Corner Society</em>, can be found at the following link: <a class="link" target="_blank" href="http://www.northendwaterfront.com/home/2010/6/18/street-corner-society-video-of-william-foote-whyte-north-end.html">http://www.northendwaterfront.com/home/2010/6/18/street-corner-society-video-of-william-foote-whyte-north-end.html</a>. What role did Whyte play in the field: complete observer, complete participant, or something in between? Use evidence from the interview to support your answer. What pros and cons of field research come up in the interview?</li>
<li>Where do you think is the best place to reside on the observer-participant continuum? Why? What are the pros and cons of each of the various places on the continuum?</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id=navbar-bottom class="navbar">
<div class="navbar-part left">
<a href="s13-00-field-research-a-qualitative-t.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-left.png"></a> <a href="s13-00-field-research-a-qualitative-t.html">Previous Section</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part middle">
<a href="index.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-up.png"></a> <a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-part right">
<a href="s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html">Next Section</a> <a href="s13-02-pros-and-cons-of-field-researc.html"><img src="shared/images/batch-right.png"></a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="shared/book.js"></script>
</body>
</html>