Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Converge backbeat images #2600

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: development/9.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

Build federation image as additional layers on top of "standard" backbeat image, to avoid duplication and ensure the image we tested is used in production.
There are still some differences at the moment (e.g. name of user, path) which should be further converged to minimize differences, may be done over time after considering all things.

This allows us to fully control (and minimize) what gets into the image, relying on any official node image. Also, now switch from python-based supervisord to a golang reimplementation [1], to minimize dependencies and CVEs.

Finally, took the change to fix startup command of the image, to ensure it properly propagates OS signals.

[1] https://github.com/ochinchina/supervisord

Issue: BB-633

Benefit is to avoid duplicating image, make sure we actually run the
build we tested, and reduce dependency on federation.

Additionally, switched to `ochinchina/supervisord`, so we can fully
remove the python dependency and reduce image size.

Differences are very few:
- Install ballot and supervisord
- Run as `scality` user
- Run supervisord as entrypoint

Issue: BB-633
Remove redundant shell command (implicit from using shell form of `CMD`)
and use exec to run supervisord.

Issue: BB-633
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 11, 2024

Hello francoisferrand,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 11, 2024

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.35%. Comparing base (341880c) to head (b224aa6).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 15.71% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 61.68% <ø> (ø)
Ingestion 67.53% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 46.61% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 84.20% <ø> (ø)
Replication 51.40% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.0    #2600   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            54.35%   54.35%           
================================================
  Files                  201      201           
  Lines                13336    13336           
================================================
  Hits                  7249     7249           
  Misses                6077     6077           
  Partials                10       10           
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.54% <ø> (ø)
api:routes 9.35% <ø> (ø)
bucket-scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
ingestion 12.28% <ø> (ø)
lib 7.36% <ø> (ø)
lifecycle 18.82% <ø> (ø)
notification 1.08% <ø> (ø)
replication 18.58% <ø> (ø)
unit 4.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants