Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move ScyllaDB rack properties generation out of the sidecar #1720

Open
Tracked by #1684 ...
tnozicka opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2231
Open
Tracked by #1684 ...

Move ScyllaDB rack properties generation out of the sidecar #1720

tnozicka opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2231
Assignees
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@tnozicka
Copy link
Member

tnozicka commented Feb 9, 2024

Similarly to #1714 we should move sidecar logic that generates rack properties file out of the sidecar so it's in the correct place (operator) and we can remove the need for the sidecar eventually.

@tnozicka tnozicka added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Feb 9, 2024
@tnozicka tnozicka self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

The Scylla Operator project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 30d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out

/lifecycle stale

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 12, 2024
@tnozicka
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-lifecycle stale
/triage accepted

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 12, 2024
@tnozicka tnozicka removed their assignment Nov 25, 2024
@zimnx zimnx linked a pull request Dec 3, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants