Upcoming changes in run-command

[bard]

Thought I'd give you a heads-up about changes in the next version of run-command, as they might impact compatibility with this collection.

• Recipes will support an optional :runner property pointing to runner function; the runner function configures the buffer where the command runs to (among other things) select the major mode, such as term-mode, compilation-mode etc. When the recipe doesn't have a :runner property, the value of the run-command-default-runner variable is used instead.

• There will be no run-command--run-compile, run-command--run-term, and run-command--run-vterm functions anymore. (As you might know, functions and variables prefixed with double hyphen are considered internals and can change or disappear at any time.)

• The "lisp function" experiment will almost certainly be retired.

• Finally, some of the recipes currently featured as examples might become part of the package; there may be overlap but there should be no danger of name conflict. (Initially I considered pointing to this package, but the implementations here seem quite a bit heavier on code than how I originally envisioned recipes, as lightweight and mostly data, to allow understanding and hacking by people who know little elisp.)

[bard]

Some documentation about the next version is up: https://bard.github.io/emacs-run-command

[semenInRussia]

I will try remove usages of the internal functions and make code of the recipes more easily where can, but most of the recipes from this repo couldn't be more easily, so think the cookbook from your repo is an awesome idea! and link to this repo is superfluous.

Thanks for last changes, i think it cool!

[semenInRussia]

• Ye. I start use keywords :runner and :hook instead of my
  crutches in the last commits
• Usages of the internal functions of run-command is in the past in
  this repo
• "lisp function" now isn't adding after installation
• Name conflicts with your built-in recipes wont't happened, because I
  use for each recipe prefix run-command-recipes-, you use
  run-command-recipe- (without s)

if you think, that I closed the your remarks, then close this issue

Good Luck!

[bard]

I guess so, but only had a quick glance, so it's up to you.

One thing you might want to keep in mind is that one of the term modes (either term.el or eat.el) will become the default on *nix platforms, so perhaps you don't need to specify it with :runner. The other is that specifying it might actually break things for Windows users, since term modes don't work there (run-command will default to compilation-mode).