-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce stub_env helper #210
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new method, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
c08905a
to
23f8fd0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
spec/support_specs/stub_env_spec.rb (1)
5-5
: Clarify the source of the copied code.The repository file
spec/support/stub_env.rb
differs from the provided external source. The comment in the repository file mentions it was inspired by a different URL (https://github.com/ljkbennett/stub_env/blob/master/lib/stub_env/helpers.rb
). Please verify and update the attribution to ensure proper compliance with licensing requirements.
spec/support/stub_env.rb
: Update the comment to reflect the correct source URL.Analysis chain
Verify the source of the copied code.
The comment indicates that the code was copied from an external source. It's essential to ensure that this is compliant with licensing requirements and that the code is up to date.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the external source of the copied code. # Test: Open the URL in a browser or check the latest version of the file. echo "Please manually verify the source at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/gems/gitlab-rspec/lib/gitlab/rspec/stub_env.rb"Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the content of the copied code in the repository and compare it with the external source. # Step 1: Extract the content of the specified file from the external source. curl -s https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/raw/master/gems/gitlab-rspec/lib/gitlab/rspec/stub_env.rb -o /tmp/external_stub_env.rb # Step 2: Find the corresponding file in the repository. fd stub_env.rb # Step 3: Compare the content of the external file with the repository file. fd stub_env.rb --exec diff -q {} /tmp/external_stub_env.rbLength of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Show the differences between the external source file and the repository file. # Step 1: Extract the content of the specified file from the external source. curl -s https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/raw/master/gems/gitlab-rspec/lib/gitlab/rspec/stub_env.rb -o /tmp/external_stub_env.rb # Step 2: Find the corresponding file in the repository. repo_file=$(fd stub_env.rb) # Step 3: Show the differences between the external file and the repository file. diff -u "$repo_file" /tmp/external_stub_env.rbLength of output: 873
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- spec/command/copy_image_from_upstream_spec.rb (3 hunks)
- spec/command/deploy_image_spec.rb (2 hunks)
- spec/command/promote_app_from_upstream_spec.rb (3 hunks)
- spec/command/setup_app_spec.rb (1 hunks)
- spec/core/controlplane_api_direct_spec.rb (4 hunks)
- spec/core/controlplane_spec.rb (2 hunks)
- spec/spec_helper.rb (2 hunks)
- spec/support/stub_env.rb (1 hunks)
- spec/support_specs/stub_env_spec.rb (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- spec/command/promote_app_from_upstream_spec.rb
- spec/spec_helper.rb
Additional comments not posted (15)
spec/support_specs/stub_env_spec.rb (3)
9-17
: Approve the basic functionality test ofstub_env
.The test checks all the basic functionalities of the
stub_env
method, ensuring it correctly stubs the environment variable for different access methods.
19-25
: Approve the handling of nil values instub_env
.This test ensures that
stub_env
correctly handlesnil
values by using default values or raising errors as expected.
3-3
: Ensure required module is correctly referenced.The
require
statement is critical for functionality. Ensure that the path provided matches the actual location of thestub_env
module in the project structure.Verification successful
The required module is correctly referenced.
The
require "support/stub_env"
statement correctly references thespec/support/stub_env.rb
file.
spec/support/stub_env.rb
exists and matches the required path.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the required module file. # Test: Search for the file. Expect: At least one occurrence. fd --type file "stub_env.rb"Length of output: 53
spec/support/stub_env.rb (4)
13-23
: Approve the flexible handling of input types instub_env
.The method correctly handles both Hash and single key-value pairs, providing flexibility in how environment variables can be stubbed.
29-38
: Ensure correct and secure handling of stubbed values.The method correctly intercepts calls to
ENV
methods and returns the appropriate stubbed values or raises errors as expected. This is crucial for ensuring the integrity of the stubbing process.
40-49
: Verify the initialization and re-initialization of stubs.The method
init_stub
ensures that original behaviors are restored before new stubs are added, which is important for test isolation.
3-3
: Verify the source of the copied code.As with the test file, ensure compliance with licensing requirements and verify the code's origin.
spec/core/controlplane_api_direct_spec.rb (1)
10-10
: Approve the integration ofstub_env
in various scenarios.The changes effectively replace previous
ENV
stubbing methods withstub_env
, enhancing consistency and isolation in tests.Also applies to: 18-18, 42-42, 51-51, 61-61
spec/core/controlplane_spec.rb (1)
22-22
: Approve the integration ofstub_env
in command output scenarios.The changes effectively replace previous
ENV
stubbing methods withstub_env
, enhancing consistency and isolation in tests.Also applies to: 51-51, 59-59
spec/command/deploy_image_spec.rb (2)
65-65
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.The introduction of
stub_env("APP_NAME", app)
correctly replaces the direct setting of theAPP_NAME
environment variable, improving test isolation and consistency.
95-95
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.The usage of `stub_env("APP
_NAME", app)` is consistent and appropriate, ensuring that the environment variable is correctly set for the test context.
spec/command/copy_image_from_upstream_spec.rb (3)
49-49
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.The
stub_env("CPLN_UPSTREAM", upstream_app)
is correctly used to replace direct environment variable manipulation, enhancing test isolation.
65-67
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.The use of
stub_env
for bothCPLN_UPSTREAM
andCPLN_ORG_UPSTREAM
is appropriate and improves test isolation by avoiding direct environment variable manipulation.
96-98
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.The consistent use of
stub_env
for setting environment variables ensures better test control and isolation.spec/command/setup_app_spec.rb (1)
165-165
: Correct use ofstub_env
method.Replacing
ENV.fetch
withstub_env("CPLN_ORG", nil)
is a good practice for test isolation, ensuring that the environment variable is unset in a controlled manner.
What does this PR do?
This PR adds
stub_env
helper which fully stubs ENV variables and more reliable than current approachWhy?
Noticed that
ENV
variables stubbing in specs are "too wordy" and strongly linked to how they are accessed in classes/modules which are being tested:ENV.fetch
(which is default ENV variable). All we care about is thatENV
variable is set and returns some valueENV
variable isn't set.ENV.key?("CPLN_ENDPOINT")
will returnfalse
, for exampleNote
StubENV
module is copied from gitlab-rspec gemSummary by CodeRabbit
Tests
stub_env
method for stubbing environment variables.stub_env
for setting environment variables, improving test isolation and management.StubENV
and corresponding tests to support environment variable stubbing.Chores
StubENV
in RSpec configuration for consistent use across tests.