Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Figure out deal with longer sidechain/backbone length lists #16

Open
mrshirts opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Figure out deal with longer sidechain/backbone length lists #16

mrshirts opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mrshirts
Labels
For release This needs to be addressed before first code release

Comments

@mrshirts
Copy link
Contributor

mrshirts commented Jun 9, 2020

If you pass in a list like [4,2] to "backbone_lengths", it only uses the first entry. I assume that might be used for A/B monomers, but would have to check. . .
@mrshirts mrshirts self-assigned this Jun 9, 2020
@cwalker7 cwalker7 added the For release This needs to be addressed before first code release label Jul 23, 2020
@cwalker7
Copy link
Contributor

cwalker7 commented Aug 7, 2020

I think this shouldn't be a problem now with the particles and bond lists specified explicitly in the new cgmodel?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mrshirts mrshirts

Labels
For release This needs to be addressed before first code release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mrshirts @cwalker7