-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract storage, api and web layers into pluggable components #12
Comments
I recently integrated the concepts from this gem into an existing Rails app. I appreciate your work, @dblock, and all the help you've given me along the way. I was unable to use this gem as-is because I did not want to introduce MongoDB as a dependency. Here's what I did instead:
Next up for me:
For both of these, I don't want the code where those activities take place to interact with the service instance since they are different processes (for me, separate dynos in separate process types on heroku). I'd love to find a way to contribute my work to this gem. I tend to think reducing its assumptions about storage is a key first step, which is at least part of what this issue is about. |
+1 on reducing the assumptions about storage - I think the first step would be to extract a storage interface |
I am starting some work to extract the storage interface for use in a private project. It will be available in my repositories, would appretiate some feedback later. |
I am looking to SlackRubyBotServer::App and considering what should or should not continue in this class. I think some methods should be removed from the App class: Others, even being related to database, have something to do with SlackRubyBotServer, like: Do you have some considerations in this matter? |
Take a look at #38, build on top of that. |
From #3, we probably want:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: