-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing assumptions #50
Comments
@elwazana update the manual version to reintroduce the missing information. We'll have to make corresponding changes to the Drasil version. |
@smiths I forgot to ask during the meeting, but do you mean to just reset the changes that removed the assumptions, and other information? Or should I also add Ap to the description like we discussed? Also, should I do these changes in a branch and create a PR for it so you can review them before they get fully incorporated? |
@elwazana, I'm surprised you are asking. I thought I repeated the point so many times that I was boring everyone in the room. 😄 We do not want to lose ANY information. The removed assumptions are critical information. Your original question about Ap triggered the discovery of other important information that was deleted. I want ALL THE KNOWLEDGE that was deleted added back. You do not need to worry about a pull request. The Case Studies repo is not as delicate as the Drasil repo, since your changes will only impact this one example. |
swhs/SRS/PCM_SRS.tex
Lines 951 to 958 in 0fa29b3
See Dr. Smith's comment in issue #33
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: