You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! Stumbled upon this tool and it looks perfect for an uptime monitoring system that I'm building out. I have two quick questions.
Running from multiple regions
I am planning to use checkup to monitor uptime of a service
I am planning to deploy checkup using AWS Lambdas in multiple regions to improve redundancy of the system
How does checkup recommend I go about this? Would I deploy multiple copies of the frontend, checkup, and db? Or use one main frontend + db in one region, and multiple checkup lambdas in other regions, all reporting back to the single main region db?
If one region, surely the response times will be vastly different depending on the region I'm pinging from - how does uptime differentiate between these?
HA Checkup
There is a requirement to make this uptime monitoring solution a mission critical service, so high availability of the service needs to be built in
What happens if the storage mechanism is unavailable e.g. the postgres db is unavailable due to a cloud outage?
I don't see an option to have multiple storage backends defined, is it possible to do this? For example, store everything into postgres with a backup in S3, so in case postgres goes down we still have uptime metrics in S3?
Our high level planned architecture:
AWS Lambda for checkup checks
AWS Fargate for checkup frontend, fronted by a load balancer
AWS Aurora Postgres for checkup's DB
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Update, checkup seems to be reading from mysql/postgres one by one, so am I correct in saying that the performance between reading from db and reading from S3 is the same?
Hello! Stumbled upon this tool and it looks perfect for an uptime monitoring system that I'm building out. I have two quick questions.
Our high level planned architecture:
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: