Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to an operator pattern instead of helm-based values #38

Open
maxhoesel opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Migrate to an operator pattern instead of helm-based values #38

maxhoesel opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@maxhoesel
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now, this utility is pretty simplistic and limited in what it can do:

  • A single deployment can only manage a single pool
  • The pool has to already exist
  • Modifying the pool without owning it breaks the typical k8s control cycle and makes using IaC tools such as Terraform problematic

For a future revision of this tool, i'd like to rewrite it as a k8s operator that operated on a Custom Resource: Dyn6AddressPool. This CRD would serve as a template for a real address pool resource managed by the operator, in the same way that Bitnamis SealedSecrets or the standard Deployment -> Pods work. Since this is a rather substantial effort, it probably wont happen anytime soon however

@maxhoesel maxhoesel added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant