sBTC Core Library / SDK #3796
stjepangolemac
started this conversation in
sBTC
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I think this will be very helpful for sBTC moving forward. This will allow us to validate and test future sBTC versions (sBTC Mini, final release and anything in between), and would make it much easier for developers to integrate their apps with sBTC. Thank you for writing this up @stjepangolemac. Let's await more feedback before starting designing and planning for this. There's a lot of folks I can't ping here, so I'll link this discussion in the Stacks discord. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
We have a repo https://github.com/stacks-network/sbtc 🎉 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Issues that the proposal is trying to address:
The core-eng team at Trust Machines has talked about this a few times and the proposal is simple:
1.1 Wire formats
1.2 Pick between OP_RETURN and commit-reveal modes
1.3 Transaction construction
1.4 Transaction parsing
1.5 Testing
2.1 Build deposit and withdrawal transactions
2.2 Broadcast transactions
2.3 Create credentials
3.1 WASM - for usage in NodeJS, browser, and other compatible languages
3.2 pyo3 - for usage in Python
3.3 FFI, CXX, etc
We'd like some discussion to happen before we're ready to commit to this work. Do you think this is a sensible idea that would produce value for the ecosystem?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions