You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Royalty policies should not change as that could rug the derivatives
Problem we’re facing (that this change will solve)
For example, if parent ip is tagged so are the derivatives - if dispute policy is not immutable this adds risk to derivatives. Especially true when we add IPA staking in which there is direct slash of the staked capital.
Blockers / Dependencies
n.a
Directions to solve this (and which direction we are on atm)
To be defined
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Royalty policies should not change as that could rug the derivatives
Problem we’re facing (that this change will solve)
For example, if parent ip is tagged so are the derivatives - if dispute policy is not immutable this adds risk to derivatives. Especially true when we add IPA staking in which there is direct slash of the staked capital.
Blockers / Dependencies
n.a
Directions to solve this (and which direction we are on atm)
Context of this change
Royalty policies should not change as that could rug the derivatives
Problem we’re facing (that this change will solve)
For example, if parent ip is tagged so are the derivatives - if dispute policy is not immutable this adds risk to derivatives. Especially true when we add IPA staking in which there is direct slash of the staked capital.
Blockers / Dependencies
n.a
Directions to solve this (and which direction we are on atm)
To be defined
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: