-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pulsar Operator: PulsarProxy is not able configure correct Liveness check for WebSocket #1049
Comments
@mehmetsalgar Hi, after checking this issue, I think the implementation for the Proxy WebSocket is a little weird and different with the Broker WebSocket CR API.
We may refactor and change the Proxy WebSocket CR API to keep the consistent with the Broker WebSocket implementation. |
The workaround did activate the websocket service, but it did not add the 9090 port to proxy service. |
The following config works.
|
Hi,
I am using the following CRD configuration for the PulsarProxy...
This configuration uses 'http' port for liveness check for the pulsar-proxy but it uses the 'https' check on 'pulsar-proxy -websocket' I can't find any extra setting CRD to convince 'pulsar-operator-controller' to create the liveness check on http port.
This is what is created at StatefulSet
I could not find the code for the 'pulsar-operator-controller' may be there is a configuration parameter for it but I can' figure out.
I am in my test setup and I don't want to fight with the complexity TLS until proof of concept works, so is there a way to configure for Websocket container to use http port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: