-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fail to reproduce results on llff dataset #41
Comments
I got the same issue. The optimization doesn't work well on the llff dataset. |
That's strange. Are you using the data source from https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/128yBriW1IG_3NJ5Rp7APSTZsJqdJdfc1? I just tested again with:
They take |
Same happened to me. Average psnr near 17 with same configs. So strange... Some updates... |
Same happened to me, but it may be solved. from original code data = dict(
dataset_type='llff',
ndc=True,
width=1008,
height=756,
) change like this data = dict(
dataset_type='llff',
ndc=True,
factor=4,
) It seems they are not different options but they work differently. I check this three times each. |
This works for me as well |
Thanks for the amazing work. I tried to run the scrips on nerf_llff dataset using the provided llff config file but I can't seem to reproduce the results. The average psnr I got was ~17 which is quite a lot lower than the reported results in the dvgo v2 paper.
Could you please suggest changes in configurations that I can make to get better results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: