Hotfixes 2024-12-16 #2 #3238
Hotfixes 2024-12-16 #2 #3238
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new utility function Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Component
participant isMondayDate
participant DataSource
User->>Component: Trigger Schedule Action
Component->>isMondayDate: Check Date
isMondayDate-->>Component: Is Monday?
alt Is Monday
Component->>DataSource: Filter/Process Data
else Not Monday
Component->>Component: Skip Data
end
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
🔇 Additional comments (10)src/services/app/schedules.ts (2)
Ensure that setting Run the following script to verify the usage of ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more context about how this object is used. Let me gather more context about the specific code block where this assignment happens. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response: Setting The assignment is part of a well-structured system where:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all usages of `obj.aux_class_1` to confirm its impact.
# Find assignments to `aux_class_1` in the codebase
rg -A 2 -B 2 "obj\.aux_class_1" --glob "*.ts"
Length of output: 278 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for the broader context of where this assignment happens
rg -A 10 -B 10 "aux_class_1" --glob "*.ts"
# Also search for any type definitions or interfaces that might define this property
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
aux_class_1$_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 27252 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the assignment
rg -A 10 -B 10 "if \(assignment\.endsWith\('_B'\)\)" --glob "*.ts"
Length of output: 2243
Ensure that setting Run the following script to verify the usage of ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more context about how this object is used in the codebase. Let me search for the object initialization and its usage pattern to understand the complete flow. Let me check how this object is initialized and what other properties are set before the final usage. Let me check one final thing - the object initialization and the function signature to understand the complete context. Setting The code is part of the 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all usages of `obj.main_hall` to confirm its impact.
# Find assignments to `main_hall` in the codebase
rg -A 2 -B 2 "obj\.main_hall" --glob "*.ts"
Length of output: 274 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the usage of this object
rg -B 10 -A 10 "obj\.main_hall = true" --glob "*.ts"
# Find where this object is used after the assignment
ast-grep --pattern 'const obj = { $$$'
Length of output: 1083 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Find the object initialization and its complete usage context
rg -B 20 -A 20 "obj\.main_hall = true" --glob "*.ts"
# Find where this result array is used
ast-grep --pattern 'result.push(obj)'
Length of output: 2559 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Find the object initialization and the complete function context
rg -B 50 -A 10 "obj\.main_hall = true" --glob "*.ts" --context-separator="=========="
Length of output: 3433 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Find the function declaration and object initialization
rg -B 100 -A 10 "obj\.main_hall = true" --glob "*.ts" --context-separator="=========="
Length of output: 6156 src/views/meetings/midweek/S89/default/index.tsx (1)
By directly passing Run the following script to check where ✅ Verification successful
From the codebase analysis,
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all assignments to `data.aux_class_1` to ensure it is properly initialized.
# Search for assignments to `data.aux_class_1`
rg -A 2 -B 2 "data\.aux_class_1\s*=" --glob "*.ts*" --glob "!node_modules/*"
Length of output: 78 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the context and usage of aux_class_1
# Search for any occurrence of aux_class_1
rg "aux_class_1" --glob "*.ts*" --glob "!node_modules/*" -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for the interface or type definition that might contain aux_class_1
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
aux_class_1$_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 19334 src/states/sources.ts (2)
Ensure that Run the following script to verify the import: ✅ Verification successfulImport of The function 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check that `isMondayDate` is properly exported and imported.
# Find the export of `isMondayDate`
rg -A 2 -B 2 "export function isMondayDate" --glob "*.ts"
# Check for imports of `isMondayDate` in other files
rg -A 0 -B 0 "import.*isMondayDate.*from.*@utils/date" --glob "*.ts"
Length of output: 252 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of isMondayDate in the utils directory
fd "date.ts" --type f --exec cat {}
# Also check for any potential circular dependencies by looking for imports from states/sources
rg -A 2 "from.*states/sources" --glob "*.ts"
Length of output: 13796
Verify that the Run the following script to test ✅ Verification successful
The function correctly identifies Mondays by checking if the day of the week equals 1 (Monday in JavaScript's Date.getDay()). The implementation is consistent across the codebase: export const isMondayDate = (date: string) => {
const inputDate = new Date(date);
const dayOfWeek = inputDate.getDay();
return dayOfWeek === 1;
};The function is used consistently in multiple places for filtering Monday dates:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Validate `isMondayDate` function with sample dates.
# Create a temporary TypeScript file to test `isMondayDate`
echo -e "import { isMondayDate } from '@utils/date';\nconsole.log(isMondayDate('2024/12/16')); // Expected: true\nconsole.log(isMondayDate('2024/12/17')); // Expected: false" > tempTest.ts
# Since we cannot run TypeScript code here, please run this test in your development environment.
Length of output: 194 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the isMondayDate function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function isMondayDate($_) { $$$ }'
# Also search for any tests related to this function
rg "isMondayDate.*test" -l
# Let's also see the actual implementation with context
rg "isMondayDate" -A 5
Length of output: 8840 src/features/meetings/weekly_schedules/week_selector/useWeekSelector.tsx (1)
When filtering Run the following script to list all ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response: Date filtering logic is correctly implemented The date filtering implementation is correct and includes all valid weeks because:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: List all `sources` after applying the filter to verify correctness.
# Output filtered `sources` with `weekOf` dates
rg -A 2 -B 2 "sources\.filter" --glob "*.ts*" | grep -E "weekOf"
# Verify that all expected weeks starting from `minDate` are included
Length of output: 821 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check implementation of isMondayDate function
ast-grep --pattern 'function isMondayDate($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check minDate usage and initialization
rg "minDate" --glob "*.ts*" -A 2 -B 2
# Check date-related utility functions
rg "getWeekDate|getMonday" --glob "*.ts*" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 25763 src/features/meetings/midweek_export/useMidweekExport.tsx (2)
Clean integration of the
The indentation of the date comparison logic after the Monday check appears inconsistent. Consider adjusting the indentation to maintain a clear logical flow. const weeksList = schedules.filter((schedule) => {
const isMonday = isMondayDate(schedule.weekOf);
if (!isMonday) return false;
-
const [yearStart, monthStart] = startMonth.split('/');
const [yearEnd, monthEnd] = endMonth.split('/');Additionally, let's verify that this change doesn't break existing schedule exports. src/features/meetings/schedule_publish/useSchedulePublish.tsx (2)
Clean integration of
The addition of the Monday date filter could potentially impact the display of existing schedules. We should verify:
✅ Verification successfulNo impact on existing schedule data The implementation is safe and won't affect existing schedules because:
The added Monday date filter aligns with the existing data validation patterns in the codebase and won't hide any valid schedules. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any non-Monday dates in existing schedule data that might be affected
# Look for schedule data files
echo "Searching for schedule data files..."
fd -e json -e ts -e tsx | grep -i "schedule\|source"
# Check for date patterns in these files
echo "Checking date patterns in found files..."
rg "weekOf.*[0-9]{4}/[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}" -l | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "weekOf.*[0-9]{4}/[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}" "$file"
done
Length of output: 7787 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of isMondayDate function and verify if there's any data validation
echo "=== Checking isMondayDate implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'function isMondayDate'
echo -e "\n=== Checking for date validation in sources handling ==="
rg "weekOf.*validation|validateDate|isValid.*date" -A 3
echo -e "\n=== Looking for test data or sample dates ==="
rg "weekOf.*=" -A 1
Length of output: 30362 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of isMondayDate function
echo "=== Checking isMondayDate implementation ==="
rg "isMondayDate.*=" -B 2 -A 5
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any existing date validation or Monday checks ==="
rg "getDay\(\).*===.*1|isMonday|monday.*check" -A 2
Length of output: 10405 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 3.4.2 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
organized-app
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
organized-app
|
| Branch Review |
main
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 09s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | rhahao |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
1
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
No description provided.