Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I am interested in getting track ik integrated. I would post the question on track ik to see if they would be interested in making track_ik_lib ROS-agnostic. If not, it looks like the track_ik_lib is stable so we could just copy the contents into tesseract_kinematics along with your plugin and make it an optional build. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I've added the plugin as a new project, pending the creation of a ROS-agnostic Trac-IK fork. Is this OK with you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I've created a tesseract_kinematics plugin for the Trac-IK inverse kinematics solver. Would you be interested in including this in the main repo?
Problem is that it currently depends on a non-ROS-agnostic ROS2 fork. The main repo now also is updated for ROS2, but is even less ROS-agnostic (needs a node as parameter).
If we'd want to include this, probably forking it under tesseract_robotics and making the trac_ik_lib subproject ROS-agnostic would be the way to go. Afterwards we should try to get this restructured version PR'd to the original repo.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions