Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding devices and updating device names #44

Open
SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Adding devices and updating device names #44

SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab

We are moving to a more detailed device names, which should address the redundancy of the current naming system in RiverDB (ie YSI devices measure both dissolved oxygen and conductivity).

Our conductivity meters would be EC-SSI-1, EC-SSI-2, etc.

We also need to add new devices for silica, bacteria, phosphate and nitrate (if we move them out of the lab section).

I am wondering whether, if we were to make these fixes (update device names, do turbidity medians, etc.), could we then delete all of our data currently in RiverDB and re-upload? Because the find and replace function in Excel would be a lot faster than doing a lot of these things manually. Thanks for your thoughts!

@thosmos
Copy link
Owner

thosmos commented Feb 15, 2023

Yes I think re-uploading would be faster and better

@SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab
Copy link
Author

OK. So I just need to get you all of our updated device names to repopulate those lists?

@thosmos
Copy link
Owner

thosmos commented Feb 15, 2023 via email

@SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab
Copy link
Author

I have our new device names drafted. Our version includes the ID number as part of the overall device ID, but that can obviously be split out if it's easier to keep with that convention in RiverDB. I have also updated our site codes to something much simpler and more informative (I think).
Please let me know what you think on both tabs.
RiverDB updates - devices and sites.xlsx

@SierraStreamsInstitute-Lab
Copy link
Author

I'm also seeing that data pulled from RiverDB does not have site codes pre-2021. Do you know if that's accurate? Did we just not used to use them? Or is it another potential issue with the data downloader?

@thosmos
Copy link
Owner

thosmos commented Sep 13, 2023

The pre-2021 data was just test data. I think the best approach is to start over from scratch, especially because you have a few parameters that have been de-activated, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants