Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

owner_privileges.py:17-20: Implement __location_access.... #181

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Feb 9, 2019 · 22 comments
Closed

owner_privileges.py:17-20: Implement __location_access.... #181

0pdd opened this issue Feb 9, 2019 · 22 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Feb 9, 2019

The puzzle 22-0fe68fd2 from #22 has to be resolved:

@todo #22:30min Implement __location_access. Owner should
Create / modify / delete Locations associated with owned Company.
Fetch owner from g.user (if it doesnt exist than fetch its id from
session. Location id can be obtained from args.

The puzzle was created by Vatavuk on 05-Feb-19.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 9, 2019

@emilianodellacasa/z please, pay attention to this issue

@emilianodellacasa emilianodellacasa added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 9, 2019
@0crat 0crat added the scope Issue is in scope label Feb 9, 2019
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 9, 2019

Job #181 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 9, 2019

The job #181 assigned to @amihaiemil/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 14, 2019

@amihaiemil/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@amihaiemil
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse because I am a little tight on time at the moment

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 18, 2019

@0crat refuse because I am a little tight on time at the moment (here)

@amihaiemil The user @amihaiemil/z resigned from #181, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 18, 2019

Tasks refusal is discouraged, see §6: -15 point(s) just awarded to @amihaiemil/z

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 18, 2019

The job #181 assigned to @krzyk/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

krzyk added a commit to krzyk/timelessis that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
@krzyk
Copy link
Contributor

krzyk commented Feb 19, 2019

@0crat waiting for review of PR #304

@0crat 0crat added the waiting Waiting requested label Feb 19, 2019
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 19, 2019

@0crat waiting for review of PR #304 (here)

@krzyk The impediment for #181 was registered successfully by @krzyk/z

krzyk added a commit to krzyk/timelessis that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
krzyk added a commit to krzyk/timelessis that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
krzyk added a commit to krzyk/timelessis that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
@0pdd 0pdd closed this as completed Feb 20, 2019
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Feb 20, 2019

The puzzle 22-0fe68fd2 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Feb 20, 2019

@0pdd the puzzle #329 is still not solved.

@0crat 0crat removed the waiting Waiting requested label Feb 20, 2019
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

Job was finished in 34 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

Job #181 is not in the agenda of @krzyk/z, can't inspect

@0crat 0crat removed the scope Issue is in scope label Feb 20, 2019
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

The job #181 is now out of scope

@krzyk
Copy link
Contributor

krzyk commented Feb 20, 2019

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

@0crat status (here)

@krzyk This is what I know about this job in CF9LG1YCA, as in §32:

  • The job #181 is not in scope
  • The job is waiting quality review verdict by @ypshenychka/z for 1hr
  • @krzyk/z will receive 35 minutes after quality review
  • Job footprint (restricted area)

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

Order was finished, quality is "good": +40 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Feb 20, 2019

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Feb 21, 2019

@0pdd the puzzle #358 is still not solved; solved: #329.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Mar 11, 2019

@0pdd the puzzle #526 is still not solved; solved: #329, #358.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants