Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timescale 2.17 / Postgresql 17 support #813

Closed
gabrielstellini opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Timescale 2.17 / Postgresql 17 support #813

gabrielstellini opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
feature-request And area of analysis that could be made easier

Comments

@gabrielstellini
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like

Are there plans to have postgresql-17 support for timescaledb-toolkit?

https://packagecloud.io/app/timescale/timescaledb/search?dist=&filter=all&page=2&q=postgresql-17

The docs point to here when referring to hyperfunctions, but there are no packages matching timescaledb-toolkit-postgresql-17.

@iliyas86
Copy link

if there's a tentative timeline or plan for when the toolkit will support PostgreSQL 17. We're currently planning to upgrade to PostgreSQL 17 and would like to know if there are any upcoming releases or near-term plans to provide compatibility.

Any information or insights would be greatly appreciated!

@Jo0
Copy link
Contributor

Jo0 commented Oct 22, 2024

I feel like I'm pretty close with this PR #819. No idea who I should get in contact with to resolve some GH Actions stuff.

@skreborn
Copy link

#819 and #824 are now merged. Does this complete PostgreSQL 17 support?

@gabrielstellini
Copy link
Author

I don't think so, since there hasn't been a release yet

@psztoch
Copy link

psztoch commented Nov 14, 2024

Do not forget about arm64 architecture packages for Debian.

@gabrielstellini
Copy link
Author

gabrielstellini commented Nov 18, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request And area of analysis that could be made easier
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants
@skreborn @psztoch @gabrielstellini @Jo0 @iliyas86 and others