-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Support for recurring to-do items. #55
Comments
Oh, never mind. I just realized that this is already on the list of planned things. Not sure if I should close this or keep it open. For other people like me who forget to look everywhere else first. |
It would be good to follow sleek recurring convention. |
I believe this is the same format most todo.txt apps follow as well. Originally from topydo I think. |
I don't know if it matters to you, but this is a single missing feature that stops me from using ntodo rather than the (now seemingly dead) todo.txt app. Would love to see it! (And throw a donation as a thank you!) |
My appolgies, I hate being 'that one'. But I'm curious if this is something near-term or long-term. I'm dying to get away from those proprietary format todo apps... |
It would be nice to support to do items that need to happen once a week or every three days or whatever. Things like cutting fingernails or changing the pet cage.
Two types:
1: Constant dates. Some of these things would be based on a certain date and then every X number of days past that date. Things like paying a bill, where it's the same day every month.
2: Moving dates. This would be based on a certain number of days past the last time that Todo item was completed. So things like cutting fingernails, where if I usually do it once a week, but maybe I was a few days late, then the next due date would be seven days after I last completed the to-do item, instead of seven days from the original due date of the previous iteration.
Either way, I would want it to keep a record of every completed time that I did that to-do item, but then create a new iteration of the to-do item for the next one, if that makes sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: