Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Faraday version conflicts with twitter 6.0.0 #59

Open
andrewkendall opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Faraday version conflicts with twitter 6.0.0 #59

andrewkendall opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@andrewkendall
Copy link

It's currently not possible to use tumblr_client 0.8.5 with twitter 6.0.0.

Attempting to results in:

Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "faraday":
  In Gemfile:
    tumblr_client (= 0.8.5) was resolved to 0.8.5, which depends on
      faraday_middleware (~> 0.9.0) was resolved to 0.9.2, which depends on
        faraday (< 0.10, >= 0.7.4)

    tumblr_client (= 0.8.5) was resolved to 0.8.5, which depends on
      faraday (~> 0.9.0)

    twitter (= 6.0.0) was resolved to 6.0.0, which depends on
      faraday (~> 0.10.0)

It can be fixed by updating the Faraday version: digitalphotogallery@0e7740e

@drusepth
Copy link

drusepth commented Mar 14, 2017

You (and #56) can use a personal fork of #61 in your Gemfile.

I forked it myself and applied the change, and you're welcome to use that as well until the official repo has a fix:

#gem 'tumblr_client'  - Switch back to official gem after #61 is merged
gem 'tumblr_client', github: 'drusepth/tumblr_client'

@duartemvix
Copy link

duartemvix commented Apr 8, 2020

I've got conflicts too requiring 'google-cloud-storage' whenever faraday is set to ~> 0.9.0 in gemspec. Apparently this update has been left around here for long.

@pskl
Copy link

pskl commented Mar 16, 2021

@drusepth Solved it for me, let's hope the maintainer fixes this soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants