-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Wireguard-UI (webUI for wireguard) #387
Comments
What about https://github.com/WeeJeWel/wg-easy/ ? |
I am so sorry for delay in replying, I did not see the notification email. This looks like a great option! Did you get it working? If so would you mind sharing your on.boot script? |
I haven't had the time to really commit anything as of late. |
I finally got around to have a go at this but struggled to get it working for me. I created the following: /mnt/data/on_boot.d/25-wg-easy.sh
I used the ports 51825 & 51826 while testing so not to interupt my current wireguard setup. This creates the container correctly and I can access the wg-easy webui but wireguard itself is not accessable to me via any of the configs it creates. I added the 51825 port to my forwarding rules with my usual (functioning) 51820 wireguard port. Any advice would be greatly appreciated as a UI for wireguard would be brilliant. |
I successfully used this: https://github.com/WeeJeWel/wg-easy/discussions/189 |
Another good option |
I need beta-testers for my repo. Wireguard-ui is included there. Requirements: UDM base or pro, firmware at least on 2.4.x (fully tested on my UDM base 2.5.x). see here. Start with this commandline (save your wg0.conf if something happens)
then
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Having to connect to my UDM via SSH every time I want to add a new client device to my wireguard config is a pain, especially when I am away and realise that my tablet which I haven't used since last holiday is not set up!
Describe the solution you'd like
Addition of a webUI for the management of wireguard such as Wireguard-UI: https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/wireguard-ui
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have created a very janky working install of wireguard-UI but it defo does not follow best practices
Additional context
I initially made the request on the wireguard-kmod repo but I do not think the dev is interested in including it on his side of things.
There is a discussion here: tusc/wireguard-kmod#66 including an explanation of how I managed my very janky setup!!
Would be brilliant to see this integrated in a proper manner!!
Thanks so much for all your work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: