You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The one obtained from the relaced_ik_core doesn't include the pi/2 rotation for Yaw on the end effector. (first image is of the relaxed_ik and the second is the one from Kinova)
My question is if I change this value so it matches kinova's xacro/urdf will that have a negative effect on IK?
Will I have to retrain the neural network?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good question. This depends on whether or not the changed values in the urdf would change the resulting robot pose given the same robot state vector. For example, if joint values [0,0,0,0,0,0] had the robot going straight up with the old urdf values and now [0,0,0,0,0,0] has the robot facing forward in a different pose, the neural network would have to be retrained. In this case, it looks like you're only shifting the end effector frame, so my guess is that retraining would not be necessary. Feel free to give it a try, and if it seems like it is leading to errors, feel free to follow up here. Thanks
I'm working with the Jaco7 and noticed that the end effector frame described in the urdf provided does not match the one you get from kinova's ROS repo https://github.com/Kinovarobotics/kinova-ros/blob/3078ec6f00225e0ec5b80aae800bd3d94a59c369/kinova_description/urdf/j2n7s300.xacro
The one obtained from the relaced_ik_core doesn't include the pi/2 rotation for Yaw on the end effector. (first image is of the relaxed_ik and the second is the one from Kinova)
My question is if I change this value so it matches kinova's xacro/urdf will that have a negative effect on IK?
Will I have to retrain the neural network?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: