From 20496c8dac12da8e37c81d882d7b53a30c72b499 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Reeder Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:40:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update --- index.html | 33 ++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 4a158e5..9c84e9e 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

pleroma/http_signatures Partial1 - No + No - Issue No rsa-sha256 @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

@peertube/http-signature - Partial7 + Partial3 Yes No - Issue @@ -109,13 +109,13 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

Misskey - http-signature + @peertube/http-signature - - No - Issue + + Partial3 Yes - No + No - Issue rsa-sha256 No @@ -154,14 +154,13 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

Funkwhale - - EliotBerriot/requests-http-signature#signature-header-support + + requests-http-message-signatures - 3 - No - No4 + Partial2 + Yes No rsa-sha256 @@ -185,7 +184,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

pleroma/http_signatures Partial1 - No + No - Issue No rsa-sha256 @@ -201,7 +200,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

No hs2019 - Yes + No No @@ -222,7 +221,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

Maybe6 Yes - No + No - Issue hs2019 No @@ -236,8 +235,7 @@

Are We HS2019 Yet?

but falls back to SHA256 if unrecognized, which technically works for current uses of hs2019
  • - 3 Temporary fork, see - this issue + 3 This implementation assumes "hs2019" is equivalent to "rsa-sha512"
  • 4 Implemented in upstream library, but not released yet @@ -249,9 +247,6 @@

    Are We HS2019 Yet?

  • 6 This implementation technically supports signature algorithm derivation, but given that it's the only one, this is not a standard
  • -
  • - 7 This implementation assumes "hs2019" is equivalent to "rsa-sha512" -