We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coordtransform/index.js
Line 24 in 9c98754
半径参数是否应该用WGS84的6378137更准确?6378245是北京54的半径参数已经弃用。
12、北京54,西安80,WGS84,国家2000 54和80本质上是参心坐标系,大地原点分别在苏联和西安,原点是参考椭球的几何中心,这类坐标难以表达高度信息,精度信息等也不够,正被淘汰。WGS84和国家2000本质上是地心坐标系,即以地球质量中心作为坐标系原点。54的椭球体长半轴半径是6378245米,80为6378140米,84和2000坐标系一样,都是6378137米。国家最新的2000坐标系和WGS84据说在厘米级都是一样的,但和80坐标在高纬度地区误差达十几倍。
参考
其它项目也采用的6378137米 https://github.com/googollee/eviltransform
https://github.com/googollee/eviltransform/blob/03ba58d92dfda57f8a1635f3805483c8fc10bd77/javascript/transform.js#L10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
嗯嗯 说的很有道理,我抽空来做一下测试后更新一下参数
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
coordtransform/index.js
Line 24 in 9c98754
半径参数是否应该用WGS84的6378137更准确?6378245是北京54的半径参数已经弃用。
参考
其它项目也采用的6378137米 https://github.com/googollee/eviltransform
https://github.com/googollee/eviltransform/blob/03ba58d92dfda57f8a1635f3805483c8fc10bd77/javascript/transform.js#L10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: