Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scope DSS Builder Content features and types #2085

Open
colinmurphy01 opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Scope DSS Builder Content features and types #2085

colinmurphy01 opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@colinmurphy01
Copy link
Collaborator

colinmurphy01 commented Nov 15, 2024

Coming out of the NWS Connect meeting we should provide clear "requirements" for the DSS Builder ensuring that our needs are met, including:

  • Key message template
  • Image size limits
  • Translations integration
  • Critical metadata
  • And anything else in our content strategy

Draft V1

Draft V2

@kmranjo
Copy link
Collaborator

kmranjo commented Nov 19, 2024

I have this initial draft put together, but since we haven't discussed this in I think over a month (since we met with the messaging continuum group, right?) I think we have to have more team discussions to confirm alignment before we can consider it good enough to send to the DSS builder folks.
Some blind spots I have here are:

  • Image size limits (I know what we'd want to limit for the site, but I don't know what limitations we're working with in terms of the images they have access to, or what limits are for the other distribution channels)
  • Translations (I haven't actually been very involved in this beyond the recent spreadsheet request, so I'm not sure what is needed here)

We also still have some gaps that we identified last time, like how this system would work if there are multiple concurrent hazards. Being able to talk through all this with product would make me more confident in the recommendation, but I know time is really crunched this week and next. How would you all like to handle this?
@colinmurphy01 @mel-keene-gsa @coreypieper @shadkeene

@colinmurphy01
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can this be added to the PO/Design sync agenda for this week? There is some urgency to get this over to Matt prior to holidays kicking in.

@colinmurphy01
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added some suggestions that might be helpful prior to review

@kmranjo
Copy link
Collaborator

kmranjo commented Nov 21, 2024

Wrote up a simplified version in this draft based on our convo in design/po sync yesterday. Is this closer to what we're looking for?

@colinmurphy01
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added some suggestions. I think this is great, but definitely check with @sarahmhgov

@kmranjo
Copy link
Collaborator

kmranjo commented Nov 21, 2024

I reviewed with Sarah and Igor late yesterday. But @sarahmhgov if you have time please give it a look and add any other feedback, since we talked through it pretty quickly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants