-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scope DSS Builder Content features and types #2085
Comments
I have this initial draft put together, but since we haven't discussed this in I think over a month (since we met with the messaging continuum group, right?) I think we have to have more team discussions to confirm alignment before we can consider it good enough to send to the DSS builder folks.
We also still have some gaps that we identified last time, like how this system would work if there are multiple concurrent hazards. Being able to talk through all this with product would make me more confident in the recommendation, but I know time is really crunched this week and next. How would you all like to handle this? |
Can this be added to the PO/Design sync agenda for this week? There is some urgency to get this over to Matt prior to holidays kicking in. |
Added some suggestions that might be helpful prior to review |
Wrote up a simplified version in this draft based on our convo in design/po sync yesterday. Is this closer to what we're looking for? |
Added some suggestions. I think this is great, but definitely check with @sarahmhgov |
I reviewed with Sarah and Igor late yesterday. But @sarahmhgov if you have time please give it a look and add any other feedback, since we talked through it pretty quickly. |
Coming out of the NWS Connect meeting we should provide clear "requirements" for the DSS Builder ensuring that our needs are met, including:
Draft V1
Draft V2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: