You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
SuperLU is via Pysparse, CHOLMOD is via CVXOPT. Both are direct sparse solvers, from what I've read it seems as though CHOLMOD might be faster, since it is specifically for positive definite matrices that result from FEA problems. If it's only marginally faster (<10%), it won't be worth it since number of dependant 3rd party packages will remain the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
williamhunter
changed the title
Evaluate whether CHOMOD is faster than SuperLU
Evaluate whether CHOLMOD is faster than SuperLU
Jun 13, 2016
SuperLU is via Pysparse, CHOLMOD is via CVXOPT. Both are direct sparse solvers, from what I've read it seems as though CHOLMOD might be faster, since it is specifically for positive definite matrices that result from FEA problems. If it's only marginally faster (<10%), it won't be worth it since number of dependant 3rd party packages will remain the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: