You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
... rather than as matrices with single elements. This issue is related to #2.
Consider the index-free implementation of dot using FLAME. In the Matlab/Python implementation of FLAME, slicing and dicing results in chi_1 and psi_1 being represented as matrices. This is consistent with alpha being represented as a matrix, rather than a number, given the update
alpha += chi_1 + psi_1
I've chosen to represent alpha as a Number (consistent with my choice in this version to represent rank 1 objects as Vectors). For consistency, should I represent chi_1 and psi_1 as Numbers as well? I need to check if slicing and dicing ever results in chi_1 and psi_2 having multiple elements (I think this can happen but I haven't tested that case). If so, I may want to treat alpha as a matrix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
... rather than as matrices with single elements. This issue is related to #2.
Consider the index-free implementation of
dot
using FLAME. In the Matlab/Python implementation of FLAME, slicing and dicing results in chi_1 and psi_1 being represented as matrices. This is consistent with alpha being represented as a matrix, rather than a number, given the updateI've chosen to represent alpha as a
Number
(consistent with my choice in this version to represent rank 1 objects asVector
s). For consistency, should I represent chi_1 and psi_1 asNumber
s as well? I need to check if slicing and dicing ever results in chi_1 and psi_2 having multiple elements (I think this can happen but I haven't tested that case). If so, I may want to treat alpha as a matrix.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: