You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the paper, the sampling equation of VP SDE (=: DDPM) differs from the DDPM's form. Specifically, the multiplicand to the score function is defined as $\beta_i$ while DDPM uses $(1-\alpha_t)/(\sqrt{1-\bar{\alpha_t}})$. It seems that the code in the repo originally intended to use $\bar{\alpha_t}$ since it is initialized (but not used) as can be seen in the below snippet. Can you provide me reason for this difference?
Hi, I am just starting to work on this repo code. I noticed the authors defined different loss functions. If we are to use DDPM loss function, we would need self.alphas_cumprod that you mentioned. If you check the following lines, i.e.
Hi,
In the paper, the sampling equation of VP SDE (=: DDPM) differs from the DDPM's form. Specifically, the multiplicand to the score function is defined as$\beta_i$ while DDPM uses $(1-\alpha_t)/(\sqrt{1-\bar{\alpha_t}})$ . It seems that the code in the repo originally intended to use $\bar{\alpha_t}$ since it is initialized (but not used) as can be seen in the below snippet. Can you provide me reason for this difference?
score_sde_pytorch/sde_lib.py
Line 127 in cb1f359
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: