In React, there are two styles of component. One is a class component: class Foo extends React.Component {...}
, which accesses its props, context, and state as properties of this
: this.props.foo
, etc. The other are stateless functional components (SFCs): function Foo(props, context) {...}
. As you can see, there's no state
(hence the name - hooks do not change this), and the props and context are provided as its two functional arguments. In an SFC, state is usually best implements with a React hook such as React.useState()
.
Attempting to access properties on this
can sometimes be valid, but it's very commonly an error caused by unfamiliarity with the differences between the two styles of components, or a missed reference when converting a class component to an SFC.
The following patterns are considered warnings:
function Foo(props) {
return (
<div>{this.props.bar}</div>
);
}
function Foo(props) {
const { bar } = this.props;
return (
<div>{bar}</div>
);
}
function Foo(props, context) {
return (
<div>
{this.context.foo ? this.props.bar : ''}
</div>
);
}
function Foo(props, context) {
const { foo } = this.context;
const { bar } = this.props;
return (
<div>
{foo ? bar : ''}
</div>
);
}
function Foo(props) {
if (this.state.loading) {
return <Loader />;
}
return (
<div>
{this.props.bar}
</div>
);
}
function Foo(props) {
const { loading } = this.state;
const { bar } = this.props;
if (loading) {
return <Loader />;
}
return (
<div>
{bar}
</div>
);
}
The following patterns are not considered warnings:
function Foo(props) {
return (
<div>{props.bar}</div>
);
}
function Foo(props) {
const { bar } = props;
return (
<div>{bar}</div>
);
}
function Foo({ bar }) {
return (
<div>{bar}</div>
);
}
function Foo(props, context) {
return (
<div>
{context.foo ? props.bar : ''}
</div>
);
}
function Foo(props, context) {
const { foo } = context;
const { bar } = props;
return (
<div>
{foo ? bar : ''}
</div>
);
}
function Foo({ bar }, { foo }) {
return (
<div>
{foo ? bar : ''}
</div>
);
}