Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On designing thinner VovNet #15

Open
txytju opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

On designing thinner VovNet #15

txytju opened this issue Jun 15, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@txytju
Copy link

txytju commented Jun 15, 2020

Thanks for your great work!
I'm working on a project of instance segmentation in which taget_classes=2. I tried to use Vovnet in the project to replace the ResNet that I have already used. Because the target_class is very different from COCO, the output channels of FPN of my model is only 64 and I think the VOVnet here should be a lot thinner than COCO version.
I have designed a VovNet like the model bellow, but the result is worse than ResNet. Do you have any suggestion on how to design thinner VovNet? Thanks

StageSpec = namedtuple(
"StageSpec",
[
"index", # Index of the stage, eg 1, 2, ..,. 5
"block_count", # Number of residual blocks in the stage
"layer_per_block", # Number of OSA modules per block
"return_features", # True => return the last feature map from this stage
"in_channels",
"out_channels",
],
)
VoVNet67_eSE = tuple(
StageSpec(index=i, block_count=b, layer_per_block=l, in_channels=in_c, out_channels=out_c, return_features=r)
for (i, b, l, in_c, out_c, r) in ((1, 1, 5, 16, 48, True), (2, 3, 5, 32, 96, True), (3, 6, 5, 64, 192, True), (4, 3, 5, 128, 256, True))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant