Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Representation #37

Open
Sue-Tang-Up opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Test Representation #37

Sue-Tang-Up opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Sue-Tang-Up
Copy link

I'm going to put the refinemask to the task of building extraction, but there exists a problem when presenting the test results. Obviously, many predicted boxes are overlay so I debug the code and find that the a nms operation is missed to process the bounding boxes. Besides, masks are not given in some masks and I still cannot find a reason to explain.
1

@Sue-Tang-Up
Copy link
Author

I'm looking forward to your responses since I'm not sure whether some details of the code are missed by myself.

@Sue-Tang-Up
Copy link
Author

Sorry,I have found the nms part and use it. But I still can not solve the problem [sad]

@Sue-Tang-Up
Copy link
Author

I think it can be ascribed to the quality of the dataset!,I change the dataset and then the results are better!

@zhanggang001
Copy link
Owner

I think it can be ascribed to the quality of the dataset!,I change the dataset and then the results are better!

Sorry for replying so late.

Yeah, the better the dataset quality, the better the segmentation results.

In our paper, the improvements of RefineMask w.r.t Mask R-CNN across three datasets: Cityscapes > LVIS > COCO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants