You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have just found this project but to suite my needs there must be online editing by non-technical users. I know you want to preserve the Git-based workflow, I agree with this approanch. But I think that integrating your product with GitHub and GitLab could let the online edits become Pull Requests / Merge Requests.
Describe the solution you'd like
Authorize a Zbook account to interact with my GitLab instance as the corresponding GitLab user
When editing a page in Zbook, the changes are not applied for everyone but just for the current user
The UI somehow indicates changes that needs to be approved
Under the hood a MR is opened on GitLab with the corresponding user
When the MR is approved from GitLab the edits are available for everyone
Describe alternatives you've considered
None.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This project was originally intended to meet my personal needs (I don't need online editing myself), and after adding some features, it has just been made public. At the moment, it's unclear how many people will use it. However, adding the online editing feature you mentioned might take several weeks, so I'm not sure if it's worth the effort. If this project does gain significant traction, like reaching 1000+ stars, I would likely consider adding this feature.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have just found this project but to suite my needs there must be online editing by non-technical users. I know you want to preserve the Git-based workflow, I agree with this approanch. But I think that integrating your product with GitHub and GitLab could let the online edits become Pull Requests / Merge Requests.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
None.
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: