You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2021. It is now read-only.
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Neustradamus
changed the title
SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS + SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS supports
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) supports
Mar 20, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):
SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):
I add SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS): https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html
Linked to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: