Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[deps] Update diem deps #66

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 14, 2023

Conversation

0o-de-lally
Copy link
Contributor

  • update to diem 1.6.2-rc.2

@0o-de-lally 0o-de-lally marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2023 01:18
@0o-de-lally 0o-de-lally requested review from 0xzoz and sirouk October 14, 2023 01:18
Copy link
Contributor

@0xzoz 0xzoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got trigger happy and approved without realizing txs test fails. Otherwise LGTM. Was going to mention this when it came in but assumed it was for testing purposes.

@0o-de-lally
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got trigger happy and approved without realizing txs test fails. Otherwise LGTM. Was going to mention this when it came in but assumed it was for testing purposes.

it was a false negative. Once it reran manually it passed

@0o-de-lally 0o-de-lally merged commit f53ed49 into 0LNetworkCommunity:main Oct 14, 2023
10 checks passed
0o-de-lally added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
0o-de-lally added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
0o-de-lally added a commit to 0o-de-lally/libra-framework that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
0o-de-lally added a commit to 0o-de-lally/libra-framework that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
0o-de-lally added a commit to 0o-de-lally/libra-framework that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants