Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add STARK batching #366

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add STARK batching #366

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hratoanina
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the crate: evm_arithmetization Anything related to the evm_arithmetization crate. label Jul 8, 2024
{
let res = Vec::new();

// TODO: Implement it.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ideally we would want to use the existing compute_quotient_polys Plonky2 method, but it takes PolynomialBatch as input instead of BatchFriOracle.

// Compute all openings: evaluate all committed polynomials at `zeta` and, when
// necessary, at `g * zeta`.
// TODO: Need batched openings.
let openings = StarkOpeningSet {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The StarkOpeningSet is not suited for batch openings. We would need either to create a new struct, or have e.g. a Vec<StarkOpeningSet>.

@Nashtare Nashtare added this to the zk-continuations - Q3 2024 milestone Jul 11, 2024
@hratoanina
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #388.

@hratoanina hratoanina closed this Jul 11, 2024
@Nashtare Nashtare deleted the stark_batching branch November 26, 2024 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
crate: evm_arithmetization Anything related to the evm_arithmetization crate.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants