-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dispute actions info box: Consider cases where the round is appealed #84
Conversation
This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more). 🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/1hive/celeste-dashboard/ALn3h5tVfMPfm9c4xRVW5XFXtNwK |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM just one minnor suggestion if you feel that might suit here
if (hasVotedInConsensus) { | ||
background = backgroundColor[appeal ? 'negative' : 'positive'] | ||
icon = appeal ? IconVotingFailed : IconRewardsGreen | ||
paragraph = appeal ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we can have this as an use memo or maybe get the data from a function instead of doing so many ? :
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah i'll try to do an early return and see how it looks.
What do you mean getting the dats from a function? As you may notice i already separated this part in its own function, but there are so many different cases and conditions that i couldn't find a way to separate it and make it cleaner.
But we can try to do the early return. Also regarding the useMemo, note that the function is already inside an useMemo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
created an issue #90
Info box: Considers cases where round was appealed.
If a keeper voted in consensus with the plurality we would always show a positive message stating that they will receive rewards.
This is inaccurate as the round could have been appealed, making the final ruling different from the keeper's outcome during voting phase
For more context see #72