fix(deps): update dependency pydantic to v2.10.2

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
pydantic (changelog)	2.10.1 -> 2.10.2

---

Release Notes

pydantic/pydantic (pydantic)

v2.10.2

Compare Source

GitHub release

What's Changed

Fixes

• Only evaluate FieldInfo annotations if required during schema building by @​Viicos in #​10769
• Do not evaluate annotations for private fields by @​Viicos in #​10962
• Support serialization as any for Secret types and Url types by @​sydney-runkle in #​10947
• Fix type hint of Field.default to be compatible with Python 3.8 and 3.9 by @​Viicos in #​10972
• Add hashing support for URL types by @​sydney-runkle in #​10975
• Hide BaseModel.__replace__ definition from type checkers by @​Viicos in 10979

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the pydantic dependency from version 2.9.2 to 2.10.0. The update includes numerous new features, performance improvements, and bug fixes, but does not introduce any breaking changes as the code is practically identical to v2.10.0b2.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Update pydantic dependency version	Upgrade pydantic from v2.9.2 to v2.10.0 Update poetry.lock to reflect new dependency version	poetry.lock

Possibly linked issues

• Add CI Pipeline and release drafter #1: The PR updates pydantic, listed in the issue's dependency dashboard.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (eb56839) to head (0bef1b9).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1695   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           45        45           
  Lines         4520      4520           
=========================================
  Hits          4520      4520           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud