-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/caveat test rebase #46
Conversation
* update getAuctionStart to be a public helper, make an internal version that is more optimized(less calls/decoding), add tests * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * fix test name
* update getAuctionStart to be a public helper, make an internal version that is more optimized(less calls/decoding), add tests * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * fix test name * Astaria V1 Hook testing complete(-withdraw), Conduit Helper Removed, ConduitTransfer => AdditionalTransfer * remove commented code * final comment removal
* update getAuctionStart to be a public helper, make an internal version that is more optimized(less calls/decoding), add tests * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * coverage testing for AstariaV1Settlement handler complete * fix test name * Astaria V1 Hook testing complete(-withdraw), Conduit Helper Removed, ConduitTransfer => AdditionalTransfer * remove commented code * final comment removal * additional tests for v1 hook as well as some cleanup/fixes * update snaphot
c453fe7
to
b70045a
Compare
@@ -469,6 +453,14 @@ contract LoanManager is Ownable, ERC721 { | |||
); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
function incrementCaveatNonce() external { | |||
++caveatNonces[msg.sender]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in my change i did the seaport style nonce increment, but unsure if we care, also we need an event to both so that we can index them/invalidte things
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seaport style sounds good to me. Yeah probably should add the salt event to validateSalt as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok can just adopt my methods then they have events and the seaport style nonce update, will add events to the invalidate caveat salt
fd33e72
to
114cce4
Compare
No description provided.