Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Staging Sites: Remove a filter that disables Jetpack staging mode for WPCOM staging sites #38355

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

fluiddot
Copy link
Contributor

@fluiddot fluiddot commented Jul 16, 2024

Fixes 7894-gh-Automattic/dotcom-forge.

Proposed changes:

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

N/A

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

N/A

Testing instructions:

Note

The code is no longer used so there's no way to test it. Originally, we could test that staging badge was displayed. But following this change, the badge is no longer rendered.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Once your PR is ready for review, check one last time that all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing or skipped.
Then, add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label and ask someone from your team review the code. Once reviewed, it can then be merged.
If you need an extra review from someone familiar with the codebase, you can update the labels from "[Status] Needs Team Review" to "[Status] Needs Review", and in that case Jetpack Approvers will do a final review of your PR.


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: August 6, 2024.
  • Scheduled code freeze: July 29, 2024.

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Jul 16, 2024
@fluiddot fluiddot force-pushed the remove/wpcomsh-staging-sites-disable-staging-mode branch from c19794a to df3547f Compare July 16, 2024 17:13
@fluiddot fluiddot added [Status] Needs Team Review and removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! labels Jul 16, 2024
@fluiddot fluiddot requested a review from wojtekn July 17, 2024 09:19
@wojtekn wojtekn added [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. and removed [Status] Needs Team Review labels Jul 17, 2024
@fluiddot fluiddot enabled auto-merge (squash) July 17, 2024 09:20
@fluiddot fluiddot merged commit f80e0a5 into trunk Jul 17, 2024
54 checks passed
@fluiddot fluiddot deleted the remove/wpcomsh-staging-sites-disable-staging-mode branch July 17, 2024 09:27
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review To request a review from fellow Jetpack developers. Label will be renamed soon. label Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants