Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update hugo-build-pr-check.yml #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024
Merged

Update hugo-build-pr-check.yml #117

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

JoeyBarnes
Copy link
Collaborator

Overview/Summary

Updated version of Hugo in PR Check Action

This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

  1. Updated version of Hugo in PR Check Action

As part of this Pull Request I have

  • Read the Contribution Guide and ensured this PR is compliant with the guide
  • Checked for duplicate Pull Requests
  • Associated it with relevant GitHub Issues or ADO Work Items (Internal Only)
  • Ensured my code/branch is up-to-date with the latest changes in the main branch
  • Ensured PR tests are passing
  • Updated relevant and associated documentation (e.g. Contribution Guide, Docs etc.)

@JoeyBarnes
Update hugo-build-pr-check.yml
420773d 
Updated version of Hugo in PR Check Action
arjenhuitema
arjenhuitema approved these changes Feb 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@arjenhuitema arjenhuitema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks!

@arjenhuitema arjenhuitema merged commit 19dacc8 into main Feb 7, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@JoeyBarnes JoeyBarnes deleted the JoeyBarnes-patch-1 branch June 20, 2024 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@arjenhuitema arjenhuitema arjenhuitema approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@JoeyBarnes @arjenhuitema