JNG-5928 groups to views in jsl #270
Conversation
noherczeg
commented
Sep 23, 2024
•
noherczeg
commented
 JNG-5928 Groups to views in JSL
|
noherczeg
requested review from
robertcsakany,
gprivi,
bencegelei,
gaborflorian and
Madmat8
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive restructuring of the JSL to UI transformation process, focusing on renaming classes, updating method signatures, and introducing new operations. Key modifications include transitioning from actor-based declarations to UI menu and view declarations, enhancing the retrieval of visual elements, and refining the transformation rules. Several new rules have been added or modified to streamline the generation of UI components, reflecting a more organized framework. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant JSL
participant Navigation
User->>UI: Request Menu
UI->>JSL: Fetch UIMenuGroupDeclaration
JSL-->>UI: Return Menu Data
UI->>Navigation: Display Menu
Navigation->>User: Show Menu Options
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Comments failed to post (98)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/rowColumnDeclaration.eol (1)
14-14: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Ensure consistent usage of
fqName()method references.The change correctly updates
self.fqName(), but there's an existing instance ofs.fqName()that may require attention:
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2psm/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/data/transferFieldDeclaration.eol:throw "Could not determinate attribute type: " + s.fqName();Please verify if
s.fqName()should also be updated toself.fqName()to maintain consistency across the codebase.Analysis chain
Verify the change and its potential impact.
While the change from
s.fqName()toself.fqName()appears correct, let's ensure there are no unintended side effects:
- Confirm that
self.fqName()is the appropriate method to call in this context.- Check for any similar patterns in the codebase that might need the same correction.
Run the following script to verify the usage of
fqName()method:This script will help us ensure the consistency of the change across the codebase and verify the existence of the
fqName()method in the current class.
Adjusting verification scripts for correct file type.
It appears that
eolis not a recognized file type or language for the tools used. Let's update the scripts to use the appropriate file type. Assuming.eolis a domain-specific language or a custom extension, we might need to treat it as plain text or verify its definition in the project.Please run the following updated scripts to verify the usage of the
fqName()method:
Adjusting verification scripts to handle
.eolfiles correctly.The previous verification attempts failed because the
.eolfile type is not recognized byrgandast-grep. Let's update the scripts to directly target.eolfiles without specifying an unsupported type.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of fqName() method and identify potential similar patterns. # Test 1: Search for fqName() usage echo "Searching for fqName() usage:" rg --type eol 'fqName\(\)' # Test 2: Search for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()' echo "Searching for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()':" rg --type eol 's\.fqName\(\)' # Test 3: Verify self.fqName() exists in the current class echo "Verifying self.fqName() exists in the current class:" ast-grep --lang eol --pattern 'operation $_!$_ fqName(): $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 613
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of fqName() method and identify potential similar patterns. # Test 1: Search for fqName() usage echo "Searching for fqName() usage:" rg --type-add 'eol:*.eol' --type eol 'fqName\(\)' # Test 2: Search for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()' echo "Searching for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()':" rg --type-add 'eol:*.eol' --type eol 's\.fqName\(\)' # Test 3: Verify self.fqName() exists in the current class echo "Verifying self.fqName() exists in the current class:" ast-grep --lang eol --pattern 'operation $_!$_ fqName(): $_ { $$$ }' || echo "ast-grep: 'eol' language not supported. Please verify the language specification."Length of output: 1546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of fqName() method and identify potential similar patterns in .eol files. # Test 1: Search for fqName() usage in .eol files echo "Searching for fqName() usage in .eol files:" rg -g '*.eol' 'fqName\(\)' # Test 2: Search for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()' in .eol files echo "Searching for potential similar patterns with 's.fqName()' in .eol files:" rg -g '*.eol' 's\.fqName\(\)' # Test 3: Check for definitions of fqName() method manually, since ast-grep doesn't support 'eol' echo "Please manually verify that 'fqName()' is correctly defined in the relevant classes within .eol files."Length of output: 1305
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/visibleDeclaration.eol (1)
13-22: Consider refining the
getPos()operation for improved type safety and error handling.While the operation provides a unified way to get the position of an element across different UI container types, there are a few areas that could be improved:
The operation is defined on
Any, which might be too broad. Consider restricting it to a more specific type that encompasses all the relevant UI elements.The fallback to
~posor 0 might not be appropriate for all unhandled container types. It might be better to throw an exception or return a sentinel value (e.g., -1) to indicate that the position couldn't be determined.The operation doesn't handle the case where the element is not found in the container. This could lead to unexpected behavior if
indexOfreturns -1.The name
getPosmight not be descriptive enough. Consider a more specific name likegetPositionInContainerorgetUIElementIndex.Here's a suggested refactoring that addresses these issues:
operation UIElement getPositionInContainer(): Integer { var container = self.eContainer; var index = -1; if (container.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration) or container.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewGroupDeclaration)) { index = container.members.indexOf(self); } else if (container.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration)) { index = container.panels.indexOf(self); } if (index == -1) { if (self.~pos.isDefined()) { return self.~pos; } else { throw new Exception("Element not found in container and no custom position defined"); } } return index; }This refactored version:
- Restricts the operation to
UIElement(assuming such a type exists; adjust as needed).- Handles the case where the element is not found in the container.
- Only falls back to
~posif the element is not found, and throws an exception if even that is not defined.- Uses a more descriptive name.
Please review and adjust based on your specific requirements and type system.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/menuDeclaration.eol (1)
28-41: LGTM! Consider refactoring for consistency
The changes to getExposedVisualElements look good. Adding self to the ves set ensures the menu declaration is included, and the new loop for UIMenuGroupDeclaration improves the completeness of the operation.
For consistency and potential future extensibility, consider refactoring the member type checks into a single loop:
@cached operation JSL!UIMenuDeclaration getExposedVisualElements(): Set { var ves = new Set(); ves.add(self); - for (link in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.addAll(link.getExposedVisualElements()); - } - - for (table in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.addAll(table.getExposedVisualElements()); - } - - for (group in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.addAll(group.getExposedVisualElements()); + for (member in self.members) { + if (member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration) or + member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration) or + member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { + ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); + } } return ves; }This refactoring makes the code more maintainable and easier to extend if new member types are added in the future.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ves.add(self); for (member in self.members) { if (member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration) or member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration) or member.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); } }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/structure/transferDeclaration.etl (1)
9-9: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Multiple references to "ClassType" found that may be affected by the removal of the "::ClassType" suffix.
The recent change removes the "::ClassType" suffix from
t.name, simplifying the naming convention. However, the following files still reference "ClassType," which might rely on the previous naming structure:
src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewDeclarationForm.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/structure/transferFieldDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/rowDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/structure/transferRelationDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/application/actorDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etlsrc/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etlThese references might be affected by the change and could lead to inconsistencies or bugs if not addressed.
Analysis chain
Simplified naming approved, but verification needed.
The removal of the "::ClassType" suffix from
t.namesimplifies the naming convention, which is generally a good practice. However, this change might have broader implications.Please address the following points:
- Confirm that removing the "::ClassType" suffix doesn't break any existing code that might rely on this naming convention.
- Clarify the reasoning behind this change. Is it part of a larger refactoring effort?
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might be affected by this change.
Further verification required to ensure no remaining references to "::ClassType".
The initial search did not yield any results, but to confirm that removing the "::ClassType" suffix doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, additional verification is necessary.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of the old naming convention with "::ClassType" suffix # Test: Search for potential usages of the old naming convention rg --type-add 'epsilon:*.etl' --type epsilon '::ClassType"' # Test: Search for any direct references to this specific transformation rg --type-add 'epsilon:*.etl' --type epsilon 'ClassType.*getFqName\(\)'Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry searching for usages of the old "::ClassType" suffix in .etl files # Search for the exact "::ClassType" suffix rg --type-add 'epsilon:*.etl' --type epsilon '::ClassType"' # Search for any occurrences where 'getFqName()' might be associated with 'ClassType' rg --type-add 'epsilon:*.etl' --type epsilon 'getFqName\(\).*::ClassType' # Additionally, search for any comments or documentation referencing '::ClassType' rg --type-add 'epsilon:*.etl' --type epsilon 'ClassType'Length of output: 8478
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclaration.etl (2)
19-19: Fix the typo in property name 't.~pos'
There's an unintended tilde '
~' in the property namet.~pos. It should bet.pos.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- t.~pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); + t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);
17-19: Eliminate duplication by moving 't.pos' assignment outside the if-else block
The assignment
t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);is duplicated in both branches of the if-else statement. Consider moving it outside the if-else to avoid redundancy and improve maintainability.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
if (s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { s.eContainer.equivalent("MenuItemGroup").items.add(t); - t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); } else { var navigationController = rootMenu.equivalent("Application").navigationController; navigationController.items.add(t); - t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); } +t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewLinkDeclaration.eol (1)
24-26: Ensure
viewDeclarationis defined before usageThe code assumes that
self.referenceTypeis always defined. To prevent potential null reference exceptions, consider adding a check to ensureviewDeclarationis defined before using it.Apply this diff to add a null check:
var ves = new Set(); var viewDeclaration = self.referenceType; +if (viewDeclaration.isDefined()) { ves.add(self); ves.add(viewDeclaration); ves.addAll(viewDeclaration.getExposedVisualElements()); +}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuLinkDeclaration.etl (2)
23-23: Fix the property name
t.~postot.posThere's a typo in the property name:
t.~posshould bet.pos.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- t.~pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); + t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);Also applies to: 27-27
21-28: Refactor to eliminate duplicated assignment of
t.posThe assignment
t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);is duplicated in both branches of the if-else statement. Consider moving it outside of the if-else block to avoid code duplication.Apply this diff to refactor:
if (s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { s.eContainer.equivalent("MenuItemGroup").items.add(t); - t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); } else { var navigationController = rootMenu.equivalent("Application").navigationController; navigationController.items.add(t); - t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); } + t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { s.eContainer.equivalent("MenuItemGroup").items.add(t); } else { var navigationController = rootMenu.equivalent("Application").navigationController; navigationController.items.add(t); } t.~pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/application/actorGroupDeclaration.etl (3)
27-27: Correct the syntax error in property assignment
t.~pos.The tilde
~int.~posappears to be unintended and may cause a syntax error. It should likely bet.pos.Apply the following fix:
- t.~pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s); + t.pos = s.eContainer.members.indexOf(s);Also applies to: 31-31
13-13: Confirm correct property access in
label.value.value.Verify that accessing
label.value.valueis intentional and correct. Iflabel.valuealready contains the desired value, consider simplifying tolabel.value.Apply this fix if appropriate:
- t.label = label.value.value; + t.label = label.value;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
6-7: Handle potential null values when setting the ID and name.
Ensure that
rootMenu.nameands.getId()return valid, non-null values to prevent possible null reference errors during ID and name assignment.Consider adding null checks or default values:
t.setId( - rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/MenuItemGroup" + (rootMenu.name ?: "defaultRootMenu") + "/(jsl/" + (s.getId() ?: "defaultId") + ")/MenuItemGroup" );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewTabsDeclaration.eol (2)
21-44: Check for null
self.panelsbefore iterationTo prevent potential null reference exceptions, consider checking if
self.panelsis not null before performing selections and iterations.Apply this diff to add the null check:
operation JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration getExposedVisualElements(): Set { var ves = new Set(); + if (self.panels.isUndefined()) { + return ves; + } ves.add(self); // existing code... }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.operation JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration getExposedVisualElements(): Set { var ves = new Set(); if (self.panels.isUndefined()) { return ves; } ves.add(self); ves.addAll(self.panels.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewWidgetDeclaration)).asSet()); for (link in self.panels.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(link.getExposedVisualElements()); } for (table in self.panels.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(table.getExposedVisualElements()); } for (group in self.panels.select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewGroupDeclaration)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(group.getExposedVisualElements()); } for (tab in self.panels.select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(tab.getExposedVisualElements()); } return ves; }
21-44: Potential infinite recursion in
getExposedVisualElements()The
getExposedVisualElements()method recursively calls itself on child elements. If there are cyclic references inself.panels, this could lead to infinite recursion or a stack overflow.Consider implementing cycle detection to prevent infinite recursion. One approach is to pass a visited set to track already processed elements:
operation JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration getExposedVisualElements(Set visited = new Set()): Set { var ves = new Set(); + if (visited.contains(self)) { + return ves; + } + visited.add(self); ves.add(self); // existing code... // When calling getExposedVisualElements() on child elements, pass the visited set - ves.addAll(child.getExposedVisualElements()); + ves.addAll(child.getExposedVisualElements(visited)); return ves; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewGroupDeclaration.eol (2)
22-46: Ensure consistent use of
isTypeOf()andisKindOf()ingetExposedVisualElements()In the
getExposedVisualElements()method, there is a mix ofisTypeOf()andisKindOf()used when selecting members:
- Lines 27 and 31 use
isTypeOf()withUIViewLinkDeclarationandUIViewTableDeclaration.- Lines 35 and 39 use
isKindOf()withUIViewGroupDeclarationandUIViewTabsDeclaration.For consistency and to avoid potential issues with subclass instances, consider using the same method unless there's a specific reason for the difference.
If the intention is to include subclasses for certain types and not others, please verify that this behavior is intentional and document the reasoning.
27-43: Refactor loops to reduce code duplication
The loops from lines 27 to 43 share a similar structure, differing only in the member types they process. Consider refactoring these loops to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
You can refactor the code as follows:
var memberTypes = Sequence{ JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration, JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration, JSL!UIViewGroupDeclaration, JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration }; for (memberType in memberTypes) { var members = self.members.select(m | m.isKindOf(memberType)).asSet(); for (member in members) { ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); } } ves.addAll(self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewWidgetDeclaration)).asSet());This refactoring reduces code repetition by iterating over a collection of member types. Adjust
isKindOf()orisTypeOf()based on whether you want to include subclasses.judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/actor/actorGroupDeclaration.eol (2)
36-46: Refactor repetitive loops to improve maintainability
The loops iterating over
membersfor different types are similar and can be consolidated to reduce code duplication. Refactoring them into a single loop enhances readability and maintainability.Consider refactoring as follows:
var types = Sequence{ JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration, JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration, JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration }; for (type in types) { for (member in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(type)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); } }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var types = Sequence{ JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration, JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration, JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration }; for (type in types) { for (member in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(type)).asSet()) { ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); } }
3-4: Add a check for
self.eContainerbeing defined to prevent null reference errorsCurrently,
self.eContainer.isTypeOf(...)is called without verifying ifself.eContaineris defined. This could lead to a null reference error ifself.eContaineris undefined.Apply this diff to include the
isDefined()check:operation JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration getFqName(): String { + if (self.eContainer.isDefined() and (self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration) or self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuDeclaration))) { return self.eContainer.getFqName() + "::" + self.name; } return self.name; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTabsDeclaration.etl (3)
31-31: Add null check for
s.eContainerbefore invokingisKindOfThe guard condition uses
s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration). To avoid potential null reference exceptions, ensure thats.eContaineris defined before callingisKindOf.Apply this diff to add a null check:
- guard: s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration) and rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) + guard: s.eContainer.isDefined() and s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration) and rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.guard: s.eContainer.isDefined() and s.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration) and rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s)
34-34: Ensure
s.equivalent("TabBarVisualElement")returns a valid elementAssigning
t.element = s.equivalent("TabBarVisualElement");assumes that an equivalent element exists. Consider checking if the equivalent is defined to prevent null assignments.Apply this diff to add a check:
- t.element = s.equivalent("TabBarVisualElement"); + if (s.equivalent("TabBarVisualElement").isDefined()) { + t.element = s.equivalent("TabBarVisualElement"); + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
8-8: Handle potential undefined value from
s.getPos()Assigning
t.pos = s.getPos();assumes thats.getPos()always returns a defined value. Ifs.getPos()can be undefined, consider adding a check to prevent possible runtime errors.Apply this diff to add a null check:
- t.pos = s.getPos(); + if (s.getPos().isDefined()) { + t.pos = s.getPos(); + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewTableDeclaration.eol (3)
50-53: Avoid redundant calls to
getSelectorTableModifier()Again, store the result of
self.getSelectorTableModifier()in a local variable for efficiency.Apply this diff:
+var selectorTableModifier = self.getSelectorTableModifier(); +if (selectorTableModifier.isDefined()) { + ves.add(selectorTableModifier.row); + ves.addAll(selectorTableModifier.row.getExposedVisualElements()); +} - -if (self.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { - ves.add(self.getSelectorTableModifier().row); - ves.addAll(self.getSelectorTableModifier().row.getExposedVisualElements()); -}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var selectorTableModifier = self.getSelectorTableModifier(); if (selectorTableModifier.isDefined()) { ves.add(selectorTableModifier.row); ves.addAll(selectorTableModifier.row.getExposedVisualElements()); }
45-48: Avoid redundant calls to
getUpdateViewModifier()Similarly, store the result of
self.getUpdateViewModifier()in a local variable to prevent multiple method calls.Apply this diff:
+var updateViewModifier = self.getUpdateViewModifier(); +if (updateViewModifier.isDefined()) { + ves.add(updateViewModifier.view); + ves.addAll(updateViewModifier.view.getExposedVisualElements()); +} - -if (self.getUpdateViewModifier().isDefined()) { - ves.add(self.getUpdateViewModifier().view); - ves.addAll(self.getUpdateViewModifier().view.getExposedVisualElements()); -}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var updateViewModifier = self.getUpdateViewModifier(); if (updateViewModifier.isDefined()) { ves.add(updateViewModifier.view); ves.addAll(updateViewModifier.view.getExposedVisualElements()); }
40-43: Avoid redundant calls to
getCreateFormModifier()To improve performance and readability, consider storing the result of
self.getCreateFormModifier()in a local variable to avoid multiple method calls.Apply this diff:
var ves = new Set(); var rowDeclaration = self.referenceType; ves.add(self); ves.add(rowDeclaration); ves.addAll(rowDeclaration.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration)).asSet()); +var createFormModifier = self.getCreateFormModifier(); +if (createFormModifier.isDefined()) { + ves.add(createFormModifier.form); + ves.addAll(createFormModifier.form.getExposedVisualElements()); +} - -if (self.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()) { - ves.add(self.getCreateFormModifier().form); - ves.addAll(self.getCreateFormModifier().form.getExposedVisualElements()); -}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var createFormModifier = self.getCreateFormModifier(); if (createFormModifier.isDefined()) { ves.add(createFormModifier.form); ves.addAll(createFormModifier.form.getExposedVisualElements()); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl (5)
2-66: Enhance Code Documentation and Readability
The rules added are significant and contribute to the UI transformation capabilities. Adding comments or documentation explaining the purpose and functionality of each rule would improve maintainability and aid other developers in understanding the transformation logic.
Consider providing inline comments or documentation blocks for complex logic sections.
5-5: Potential Null Reference in Guard Condition
The guard condition uses
s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined(), but ifs.getCreateFormModifier()returnsnull, this could cause a null reference error. It's safer to check ifs.getCreateFormModifier()is notnullbefore callingisDefined().Consider updating the guard condition to handle potential nulls:
- guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.getCreateFormModifier() != null and s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.getCreateFormModifier() != null and s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()
15-15: Check for Null in
transferRelationandtargetIn line 15,
s.transferRelation.targetis accessed without null checks. If eithers.transferRelationors.transferRelation.targetisnull, this will result in a null reference error.Include null checks to ensure safety:
- t.dataElement = s.transferRelation.target.equivalent("RelationType"); + if (s.transferRelation != null and s.transferRelation.target != null) { + t.dataElement = s.transferRelation.target.equivalent("RelationType"); + } else { + // Handle the case where transferRelation or target is null + log.error("TransferRelation or target is null for " + s.name); + }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (s.transferRelation != null and s.transferRelation.target != null) { t.dataElement = s.transferRelation.target.equivalent("RelationType"); } else { // Handle the case where transferRelation or target is null log.error("TransferRelation or target is null for " + s.name); }
11-11: Ensure
formis Defined Before AccessingIn line 11,
s.getCreateFormModifier().formis accessed without checking ifformisnull. Ifformisnull, this could lead to a null reference error when callingequivalent("FormPageContainer").Add a null check for
formbefore accessing it:- t.container = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); + if (s.getCreateFormModifier().form != null) { + t.container = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); + } else { + // Handle the case where form is null + log.error("Form is null for " + s.name); + }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (s.getCreateFormModifier().form != null) { t.container = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); } else { // Handle the case where form is null log.error("Form is null for " + s.name); }
38-39: Verify Existence of Equivalent Actions Before Adding
In lines 38-39,
s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormBackAction")ands.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormCreateAction")are added tot.actionswithout checking if they are non-null. Ifequivalentreturnsnull, this could lead to runtime errors.Include null checks before adding actions:
- t.actions.add(s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormBackAction")); - t.actions.add(s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormCreateAction")); + var backAction = s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormBackAction"); + var createAction = s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormCreateAction"); + if (backAction != null) { + t.actions.add(backAction); + } else { + log.error("Back action equivalent is null for " + s.name); + } + if (createAction != null) { + t.actions.add(createAction); + } else { + log.error("Create action equivalent is null for " + s.name); + }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var backAction = s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormBackAction"); var createAction = s.equivalent("ViewLinkCreateFormCreateAction"); if (backAction != null) { t.actions.add(backAction); } else { log.error("Back action equivalent is null for " + s.name); } if (createAction != null) { t.actions.add(createAction); } else { log.error("Create action equivalent is null for " + s.name); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl (5)
15-15: Potential Null Reference in
t.dataElementAssignmentIn line 15, the assignment:
t.dataElement = s.transferRelation.target.equivalent("RelationType");Assumes that
s.transferRelationands.transferRelation.targetare always defined. If either isnullorundefined, this could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding a guard condition to ensure they are defined before accessing them.Apply this diff to add a guard condition:
- // Existing code + guard: s.transferRelation.isDefined() and s.transferRelation.target.isDefined() and (existing guard conditions)
50-52: Consistent ID and Name Generation
In the
ViewTableCreateFormCreateActionrule, the ID and name are generated as follows:t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableCreateFormCreateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Create";Ensure that the ID and name generation patterns are consistent with those used elsewhere in the project to maintain uniformity and avoid potential conflicts.
62-64: Consistent ID and Name Generation
Similarly, in the
ViewTableCreateFormBackActionrule:t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableCreateFormBackAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Back";Verify that the ID and name conform to the project's naming conventions for actions, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
45-55: Missing Guard Condition in
ViewTableCreateFormCreateActionRuleThe rule
ViewTableCreateFormCreateActiondoes not include a guard to check ifs.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined(). Accessings.getCreateFormModifier()without this check could lead to runtime errors if it's undefined.Add a guard condition to ensure safety:
@greedy @lazy rule ViewTableCreateFormCreateAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration + guard: s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() to t: UI!ui::Action { // Existing codeCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.@greedy @lazy rule ViewTableCreateFormCreateAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration guard: s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() to t: UI!ui::Action { t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableCreateFormCreateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Create"; t.actionDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainerCreateActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableCreateFormCreateAction: " + t.name); }
57-67: Missing Guard Condition in
ViewTableCreateFormBackActionRuleSimilarly, the rule
ViewTableCreateFormBackActionlacks a guard to verify thats.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()before accessing it.Include a guard condition to prevent potential runtime errors:
@greedy @lazy rule ViewTableCreateFormBackAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration + guard: s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() to t: UI!ui::Action { // Existing codeCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.@greedy @lazy rule ViewTableCreateFormBackAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration guard: s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() to t: UI!ui::Action { t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableCreateFormBackAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Back"; t.actionDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainerBackActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableCreateFormBackAction: " + t.name); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl (4)
47-56: Simplify code by extracting common variables in
AccessLinkCreateFormCreateActionIn this rule, both
s.getCreateFormModifier().formands.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType")are used multiple times. Extracting them into local variables can enhance readability.Apply this change:
@lazy rule AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { + var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; + var relationType = s.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType"); t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Create"; - t.ownerDataElement = s.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType"); + t.ownerDataElement = relationType; - t.actionDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainerCreateActionDefinition"); + t.actionDefinition = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainerCreateActionDefinition"); - t.targetPageDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("AccessLinkViewPageDefinition"); + t.targetPageDefinition = createForm.equivalent("AccessLinkViewPageDefinition"); log.debug("AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; var relationType = s.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType"); t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Create"; t.ownerDataElement = relationType; t.actionDefinition = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainerCreateActionDefinition"); t.targetPageDefinition = createForm.equivalent("AccessLinkViewPageDefinition"); log.debug("AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction: " + t.name); }
26-33: Extract common expression in
AccessLinkCreateFormBackActionIn the
AccessLinkCreateFormBackActionrule,s.getCreateFormModifier().formis used. Assigning it to a local variable enhances code clarity.Apply this change:
@lazy rule AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { + var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Back"; - t.actionDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainerBackActionDefinition"); + t.actionDefinition = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainerBackActionDefinition"); log.debug("AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Back"; t.actionDefinition = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainerBackActionDefinition"); log.debug("AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction: " + t.name); }
37-43: Improve maintainability by reusing variables in
AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateActionThe repeated use of
s.getCreateFormModifier().formcan be simplified by introducing a local variable.Apply this change:
@lazy rule AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { + var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::GetTemplate"; - t.actionDefinition = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainerGetTemplateActionDefinition"); + t.actionDefinition = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainerGetTemplateActionDefinition"); log.debug("AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
1-22: Refactor common expressions for better readability
The expression
s.getCreateFormModifier().formis used multiple times within theAccessLinkCreateFormPageDefinitionrule (lines 9, 14, 16). Consider assigning it to a local variable to enhance readability and maintainability.Apply this change:
rule AccessLinkCreateFormPageDefinition transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::PageDefinition { + var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessViewCreateFormPageDefinition"); t.openInDialog = true; t.name = s.getFqName() + "::AccessFormPage"; - t.container = s.getCreateFormModifier().form.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); + t.container = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); t.dataElement = s.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType"); t.dataElement.memberType = UI!ui::data::MemberType#ACCESS; t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction")); t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction")); if (s.actorAccess.target.isTemplateAllowed()) { - t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction")); + t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction")); } rootMenu.equivalent("Application").pages.add(t); log.debug("Create AccessViewCreateFormPageDefinition: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rule AccessLinkCreateFormPageDefinition transform s: JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::PageDefinition { var createForm = s.getCreateFormModifier().form; guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessViewCreateFormPageDefinition"); t.openInDialog = true; t.name = s.getFqName() + "::AccessFormPage"; t.container = createForm.equivalent("FormPageContainer"); t.dataElement = s.actorAccess.target.equivalent("RelationType"); t.dataElement.memberType = UI!ui::data::MemberType#ACCESS; t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormBackAction")); t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormCreateAction")); if (s.actorAccess.target.isTemplateAllowed()) { t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessLinkCreateFormGetTemplateAction")); } rootMenu.equivalent("Application").pages.add(t); log.debug("Create AccessViewCreateFormPageDefinition: " + t.name); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationFormPage.etl (2)
6-6: Refactor repeated
setIdlogic into a helper functionThe
setIdmethod calls in lines 6, 28, 39, and 49 share similar logic for generating IDs. Consider extracting this into a helper function to promote code reuse and maintainability.Apply this diff to refactor the
setIdlogic:+function generateSetId(suffix) { + return rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/" + suffix; +} - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessTableCreateFormPageDefinition"); + t.setId(generateSetId("AccessTableCreateFormPageDefinition")); - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessTableCreateFormBackAction"); + t.setId(generateSetId("AccessTableCreateFormBackAction")); - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessTableCreateFormGetTemplateAction"); + t.setId(generateSetId("AccessTableCreateFormGetTemplateAction")); - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/AccessTableCreateFormCreateAction"); + t.setId(generateSetId("AccessTableCreateFormCreateAction"));Also applies to: 28-28, 39-39, 49-49
15-17: Add null check for
s.actorAccess.targetbefore accessingIn the conditional statement at line 15, there's a potential for a null reference if
s.actorAccess.targetis not defined. To prevent any runtime errors, consider adding a null check before callingisTemplateAllowed().Apply this diff to add a null check:
- if (s.actorAccess.target.isTemplateAllowed()) { + if (s.actorAccess.target.isDefined() and s.actorAccess.target.isTemplateAllowed()) {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewPanelDeclaration.eol (3)
72-78: Add Null Check for 'self.eContainer' in 'getViewContainer'
In the
getViewContainer()method, before accessingself.eContainer.isKindOf(...), ensure thatself.eContaineris defined to prevent potential null pointer dereferences.Apply this diff to add null checks:
operation JSL!UIViewPanelDeclaration getViewContainer(): JSL!UIViewDeclaration { + if (self.eContainer.isDefined() and self.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration)) { return self.eContainer; - } else if (self.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewPanelDeclaration)) { + } else if (self.eContainer.isDefined() and self.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewPanelDeclaration)) { return self.eContainer.getViewContainer(); } return null; }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.operation JSL!UIViewPanelDeclaration getViewContainer(): JSL!UIViewDeclaration { if (self.eContainer.isDefined() and self.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration)) { return self.eContainer; } else if (self.eContainer.isDefined() and self.eContainer.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewPanelDeclaration)) { return self.eContainer.getViewContainer(); } return null; }
38-41: Add Null Check for 'member.referenceType' Before Invocation
In the loop over
ownRelations, you invokemember.referenceType.getAllRelations(). To prevent potential null pointer dereferences, please ensure thatmember.referenceTypeis defined before callinggetAllRelations(), asreferenceTypemight be undefined.Apply this diff to add a null check:
for (member in ownRelations) { + if (member.referenceType.isDefined()) { relations.addAll(member.referenceType.getAllRelations()); + } }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (member in ownRelations) { if (member.referenceType.isDefined()) { relations.addAll(member.referenceType.getAllRelations()); } } } else if (self.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewTabsDeclaration)) {
5-78: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Old Method Names Still Found in the Codebase
The following instances of the old method name
getTransferContainerwere found and need to be updated:
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/data/transferRelationDeclaration.eol:
operation JSL!TransferRelationDeclaration getTransferContainer(): JSL!TransferDeclaration {var container = self.getTransferContainer();return self.getTransferContainer().equivalent("Actor");return self.getTransferContainer().equivalent("ClassType");
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/data/transferFieldDeclaration.eol:
operation JSL!TransferFieldDeclaration getTransferContainer(): JSL!TransferDeclaration {var container = self.getTransferContainer();return self.getTransferContainer().equivalent("Actor");return self.getTransferContainer().equivalent("ClassType");Analysis chain
Verify All References to Old Type and Method Names Are Updated
Throughout the code, type names and method names have been updated to reflect the new naming conventions by adding the
UIprefix. Please verify that all occurrences of the old type names and method names in the codebase have been updated to prevent inconsistencies.Run the following script to identify any remaining instances of old type or method names:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any remaining usages of old type and method names. # Test: Search for old type names. Expect: No matches. rg 'JSL!ViewGroupDeclaration|JSL!ViewTabsDeclaration|JSL!ViewLinkDeclaration' # Test: Search for old method names. Expect: No matches. rg 'getTransferContainer'Length of output: 1372
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewDeclaration.eol (3)
22-23: Ensure Consistency in Collection Types
The
vesvariable is initialized as aSet, but methods likeselectandasSet()are being used redundantly. Sinceselectalready returns aCollection, you can streamline the code by removing unnecessary conversions to aSet.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
ves.add(self); -ves.addAll(self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewWidgetDeclaration)).asSet()); +ves.addAll(self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewWidgetDeclaration)));Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ves.add(self); ves.addAll(self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewWidgetDeclaration)));
75-92: Simplify Logic for Retrieving Own Tables
Similar to
getOwnLinks(), thegetOwnTables()operation can be simplified to improve readability and maintainability.Apply this diff:
@cached operation JSL!UIViewDeclaration getOwnTables(): Set { - var all = self.getExposedVisualElements().select(v | v.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration)).asSet(); - var res = new Set(); - - for (table in all) { - var parent: Any = table.eContainer; - while (not parent.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration) and parent.isDefined()) { - if (not parent.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration)) { - parent = parent.eContainer; - } - } - if (parent == self) { - res.add(table); - } - } - - return res; + return self.members + .select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration)) + .asSet(); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.operation JSL!UIViewDeclaration getOwnTables(): Set { return self.members .select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration)) .asSet(); }
50-67: Simplify Logic for Retrieving Own Links
The
getOwnLinks()operation contains a complex loop to determine if a link's parent is the current view. This logic can be simplified using a direct selection based on the parent's identity.Apply this diff to simplify the operation:
@cached operation JSL!UIViewDeclaration getOwnLinks(): Set { - var all = self.getExposedVisualElements().select(v | v.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration)).asSet(); - var res = new Set(); - - for (link in all) { - var parent: Any = link.eContainer; - while (not parent.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration) and parent.isDefined()) { - if (not parent.isTypeOf(JSL!UIViewDeclaration)) { - parent = parent.eContainer; - } - } - if (parent == self) { - res.add(link); - } - } - - return res; + return self.members + .select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration)) + .asSet(); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.operation JSL!UIViewDeclaration getOwnLinks(): Set { return self.members .select(m | m.isKindOf(JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration)) .asSet(); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/jslToUi.etl (1)
16-36: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Imported Modules Are Missing
The verification script indicates that none of the imported module files exist at the specified paths. Please address the following:
- Validate Import Paths: Ensure that each import path is correct relative to the repository root.
- Confirm File Existence: Verify that all imported
.etlfiles are present in themodules/view/directory.- Resolve Missing Files: If any files are missing, add them to the repository or remove unnecessary import statements.
Analysis chain
Confirm the Necessity and Correctness of the New Import Statements
The added import statements between lines 16-36 introduce several new modules. Please ensure that:
- All imported modules are necessary for the current transformations.
- The import paths are correct and the files exist.
- There are no redundant or duplicate imports.
Run the following script to verify the existence of the imported modules:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly imported modules exist at the specified paths. # Expected result: All files are found; no errors are output. # List of imported module paths extracted from the code: imports=( "modules/view/menuLinkDeclaration.etl" "modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationTablePage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/rowDeclaration.etl" "modules/view/viewDeclarationForm.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl" ) # Check if each import file exists for import in "${imports[@]}"; do if [ ! -f "$import" ]; then echo "Import file not found: $import" fi doneLength of output: 294
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly imported modules exist at the specified paths. # Expected result: All files are found; no errors are output. # List of imported module paths extracted from the code: imports=( "modules/view/menuLinkDeclaration.etl" "modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationTablePage.etl" "modules/view/menuTableDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/rowDeclaration.etl" "modules/view/viewDeclarationForm.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl" "modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl" ) # Check if each import file exists for import in "${imports[@]}"; do if [ ! -f "$import" ]; then echo "Import file not found: $import" fi doneLength of output: 4301
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewGroupDeclaration.etl (1)
20-20: Syntax error: Unexpected tilde in property assignment
The line
t.~pos = s.getPos();contains an unexpected tilde~int.~pos, which is likely a typo or syntax error. It should be corrected tot.pos = s.getPos();.Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
-t.~pos = s.getPos(); +t.pos = s.getPos();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.t.pos = s.getPos();judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationViewPage.etl (2)
19-24: Remove commented-out code to improve readability
There are large blocks of commented-out code between lines 19-37. Keeping unnecessary commented-out code can clutter the codebase and reduce maintainability. If this code is no longer needed, please remove it. If it's temporarily commented out for future use or debugging, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose.
Also applies to: 25-37
59-59: Ensure consistent use of
s.namevs.s.getFqName()for action namesIn the action rules,
t.nameis assigned usings.namein some instances (lines 59, 71, 83, 95) ands.getFqName()in another (line 107). For consistency and to prevent any confusion, consider using the same method to set the action names throughout the file. Ifs.getFqName()provides the fully qualified name and is preferred, update all occurrences accordingly.Apply this diff to standardize the action names:
- t.name = s.name + "::Back"; + t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Back"; - t.name = s.name + "::Refresh"; + t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Refresh"; - t.name = s.name + "::Cancel"; + t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Cancel"; - t.name = s.name + "::Update"; + t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Update";Also applies to: 71-71, 83-83, 95-95, 107-107
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewDeclarationForm.etl (2)
4-4: Simplify Redundant Guard Conditions
The guard conditions at lines 4 and 28 include both
s.form.isDefined()ands.form. Sinces.form.isDefined()checks whethers.formis defined and not null, the additional checks.formmay be redundant.Consider simplifying the guard conditions:
- guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.form.isDefined() and s.form + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.form.isDefined()Also applies to: 28-28
115-118: Implement
autoOpenAfterCreateFunctionalityThe
CreateActionDefinitionrule at lines 115-118 has a commented-out section forautoOpenAfterCreate. If this functionality is required, consider implementing it to ensure the action behaves as expected after creation.Uncomment and update the code if necessary:
- /* if (s.autoOpenAfterCreate.isDefined()) { t.autoOpenAfterCreate = s.autoOpenAfterCreate; } - */Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationTablePage.etl (2)
44-140: Consider refactoring repetitive action creation rules
The action creation rules (
AccessTableBackAction,AccessTableTableOpenCreateAction,AccessTableTableRefreshAction,AccessTableTableFilterAction,AccessTableOpenPageAction,AccessTableRowDeleteAction,AccessTableTableBulkRemoveAction,AccessTableTableClearAction) share similar structures and code patterns. Refactoring these rules could reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.Consider creating a parameterized helper function or a generic rule to handle action creation. This approach allows you to pass specific parameters such as action names, IDs, and definitions, thereby simplifying the codebase and making it more maintainable.
31-36: Undefined variable
tableused in action additionsThe variable
tableis not defined within the scope of theAccessTablePageDefinitionrule but is used in lines 31, 34, and 35 when adding actions. This will result in an error during transformation.To fix this issue, replace
tablewithsto reference the correct source element.Apply the following diff to correct the code:
- t.actions.add(table.equivalent("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction")); + t.actions.add(s.equivalent("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction")); ... - t.actions.add(table.equivalent("AccessTableTableClearAction")); - t.actions.add(table.equivalent("AccessTableTableBulkRemoveAction")); + t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessTableTableClearAction")); + t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessTableTableBulkRemoveAction"));Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.t.actions.add(s.equivalent("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction")); } if (s.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessTableTableClearAction")); t.actions.add(s.equivalent("AccessTableTableBulkRemoveAction")); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl (2)
62-68: Combine consecutive checks for
table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()The condition
table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()is checked twice in succession (lines 62-64 and 65-68). Consolidating these actions into a single conditional block enhances code clarity.Apply this diff to combine the actions:
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
36-41: Combine consecutive checks for
link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()The condition
link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()is checked twice in succession (lines 36-38 and 39-41). Combining these actions within a single conditional block can improve code readability.Apply this diff to combine the actions:
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl (6)
34-39: Combine repeated conditional checks
The condition
link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()is checked twice in succession. Combining these into a singleifblock improves readability and efficiency.Apply this diff:
if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorDialogAction", s.getId())); -} -if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetAction", s.getId())); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorDialogAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetAction", s.getId())); }
60-66: Combine repeated conditional checks
Similarly, the condition
table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()is repeated. Merge the actions into oneifblock.Apply this diff:
if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction", s.getId())); -} -if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationClearAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationBulkRemoveAction", s.getId())); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationClearAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationBulkRemoveAction", s.getId())); }
102-102: Incorrect placement of the
guardclauseThe
guardclause should be outside the rule block{}for proper syntax.Apply this diff:
rule ViewLinkPageDefinitionBackAction transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) - { + {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
88-88: Incorrect placement of the
guardclauseSimilarly, the
guardclause in this rule should be moved outside the{}and placed after thetoclause.Apply this diff:
rule ViewLinkPageDefinitionRefreshAction transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) - { + {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
4-4: Incorrect placement of the
guardclauseThe
guardclause should be placed outside the rule block{}, directly after thetoclause and before{. Placing it inside the block may cause syntax errors in ETL.Apply this diff to correct the placement:
rule ViewLinkPageDefinition transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::PageDefinition + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) - { + {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
6-6: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Duplicate IDs Found in UI Definitions
Duplicate IDs were detected in the following files:
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2psm/src/main/epsilon/transformations/psm/modules/action/getUploadTokenBehaviour.etl:
t.setId("(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/CreateGetUploadTokenOperation");- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl:
t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ColumnIcon");These duplicate IDs may lead to conflicts in the UI definitions.
Analysis chain
Verify uniqueness of IDs generated by
setIdThe ID generated by
t.setIdmay not be unique ifrootMenu.nameors.getId()are not unique. This could lead to conflicts in the UI definitions.Run the following script to check for duplicate IDs:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for duplicate IDs in the UI definitions. rg 'setId\(' -g '**/*.etl' | sort | uniq -dLength of output: 390
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl (5)
42-67: Consider abstracting common patterns to reduce duplication
The loops over
linkelements (lines 21~ to 40~) andtableelements (lines 42~ to 67~) have similar structures and actions. Refactoring common logic into a separate function or helper method can reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.
176-178: Remove unused variable
rowto eliminate redundancyIn the rule
ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageAction(lines 174~ to 186~), the variablerowis declared but not used:var row = s.referenceType;Removing the unused variable prevents potential confusion and aligns with best practices.
Apply this diff to remove the unused variable:
rule ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { - var row = s.referenceType; t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageAction"); t.name = s.name + "::OpenPage"; t.actionDefinition = s.equivalent("ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageActionDefinition"); t.targetPageDefinition = s.equivalent("ViewTableViewPageDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageAction: " + t.name); }
61-66: Consolidate duplicate conditions for better readability
In the loop over
tableelements (lines 42~ to 67~), the conditionif (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined())is checked twice (lines 60~ and 63~). Combining these conditions will streamline the code and improve maintainability.Apply this diff to merge the conditions:
if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction", s.getId())); - } - if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationClearAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationBulkRemoveAction", s.getId())); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (table.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationOpenAddSelectorAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationClearAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(table.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewTableDeclarationBulkRemoveAction", s.getId())); }
113-135: Add guard conditions to action rules for consistency
The rules
ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction(lines 113~ to 122~) andViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction(lines 126~ to 135~) lack guard conditions similar to other action rules. Including guard conditions ensures that these transformations only occur when appropriate.For
ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction, add the guard condition:@lazy @greedy rule ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.transferRelation.target.isUpdateAllowed() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Update"; t.actionDefinition = s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.equivalent("ViewPageContainerUpdateActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction: " + t.name); }For
ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction, add the guard condition:@lazy @greedy rule ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { + guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.transferRelation.target.isDeleteAllowed() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Delete"; t.actionDefinition = s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.equivalent("ViewPageContainerDeleteActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rule ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.transferRelation.target.isUpdateAllowed() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Update"; t.actionDefinition = s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.equivalent("ViewPageContainerUpdateActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableViewPageDefinitionUpdateAction: " + t.name); } @lazy @greedy rule ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction transform s: JSL!UIViewTableDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Action { guard: rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s) and s.transferRelation.target.isDeleteAllowed() t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction"); t.name = s.name + "::Delete"; t.actionDefinition = s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.equivalent("ViewPageContainerDeleteActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewTableViewPageDefinitionDeleteAction: " + t.name); }
21-40: Refactor repeated conditions to enhance efficiency
In the loop over
linkelements (lines 21~ to 40~), the conditionif (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined())is evaluated twice (lines 34~ and 37~). Merging these conditions can improve code clarity and reduce redundancy.Apply this diff to combine the conditions:
for (link in s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.getOwnLinks()) { var lRelation = link.transferRelation.target; t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenPageAction", s.getId())); if (lRelation.isRefreshAllowed() and not lRelation.isEager()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationRefreshAction", s.getId())); } if (link.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenFormAction", s.getId())); } if (lRelation.isDeleteAllowed()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationRowDeleteAction", s.getId())); } - if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { - t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorDialogAction", s.getId())); - } if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { - t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetAction", s.getId())); + t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorDialogAction", s.getId())); + t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetAction", s.getId())); } }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (link in s.getUpdateViewModifier().view.getOwnLinks()) { var lRelation = link.transferRelation.target; t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenPageAction", s.getId())); if (lRelation.isRefreshAllowed() and not lRelation.isEager()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationRefreshAction", s.getId())); } if (link.getCreateFormModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenFormAction", s.getId())); } if (lRelation.isDeleteAllowed()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationRowDeleteAction", s.getId())); } if (link.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()) { t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorDialogAction", s.getId())); t.actions.add(link.equivalentDiscriminated("ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetAction", s.getId())); } }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (4)
5-5: Ensure
rootMenuis properly defined before useThe guard condition now uses
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s). Please verify thatrootMenuis correctly initialized and accessible in this context to prevent potentialNullPointerExceptionor undefined behavior.
96-96: Consider error handling for
isDeleteAllowedcheckWhen checking
if (s.transferRelation.target.isDeleteAllowed()), ensure thats.transferRelation.targetcannot be null to avoid runtime exceptions.
99-102: Review duplicate condition checks on
getSelectorTableModifierThe conditions at lines 99 and 102 both check
if (s.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()). Consider combining these blocks or ensuring that the actions within each block are appropriately distinct.
113-115: Handle undefined string fields gracefully
In
ViewLinkDeclarationRepresentationColumn, the code attempts to find the first string field from the target. Throwing an exception if none is found may cause the transformation to fail. Consider handling this scenario more gracefully, possibly by logging a warning and providing a default value.judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl (2)
162-163: Ensure proper handling of
posattributeAt lines 162-163, assigning
t.~pos = s.~posmay cause issues ifs.~posis undefined. Similarly, at lines 171-173, the checkif (t.~pos.isUndefined())assumes thatt.~posmight not be defined. To prevent potential runtime errors, ensure thats.~posis defined before assigning it tot.~pos, or provide a default value if it's undefined.Consider updating the code to check if
s.~posis defined before assignment:+if (s.~pos.isDefined()) { t.pos = s.~pos; +} else { + t.pos = 0; +}Also applies to: 171-173
127-128: Potential issue with attribute naming: use of
~in attribute namesThe use of
t.~posmay not be valid syntax, as attribute names typically should not contain special characters like~. Consider renaming the attribute tot.posor confirming that~posis intentionally used and supported in this context.Apply this diff to rename the attribute:
-t.~pos = 0; +t.pos = 0;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl (3)
44-66: Incomplete
ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorFramerule definition.The
ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorFramerule only sets theidand does not define other essential properties of theFrame. Consider adding necessary properties to fully initialize theFramecomponent.For example, you might need to set properties like
name,label, or other configurations as required by theFramemodel.
228-236: Simplify naming in
SetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinition.Similarly, the rule
ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinitioncontains redundant "SetSelector" repetitions. Streamline the name for clarity and consistency.Apply this diff to correct the rule and identifiers:
@lazy -rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinition +rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::SetActionDefinition { - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); + t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Set"; t.targetType = s.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType"); - log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinition: " + t.name); + log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::SetActionDefinition { t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Set"; t.targetType = s.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType"); log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition: " + t.name); }
214-225: Correct redundant naming in
SetSelectorSetSelectorSetButton.The rule
ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetButtonand related identifiers have redundant repetitions of "SetSelector". This may lead to confusion and does not align with the naming conventions used elsewhere in the code.Apply this diff to correct the rule and identifiers:
@lazy -rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetButton +rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Button { - t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetButton"); + t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton"); t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Set"; t.label = "Set"; t.buttonStyle = "contained"; t.icon = "attachment-plus".createSyntheticIcon(s.getId(), s.getFqName()); - t.actionDefinition = s.equivalent("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); + t.actionDefinition = s.equivalent("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); - log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetSelectorSetButton: " + t.name); + log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton: " + t.name); }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rule ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton transform s: JSL!UIViewLinkDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Button { t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton"); t.name = s.getFqName() + "::Set"; t.label = "Set"; t.buttonStyle = "contained"; t.icon = "attachment-plus".createSyntheticIcon(s.getId(), s.getFqName()); t.actionDefinition = s.equivalent("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetActionDefinition"); log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorSetButton: " + t.name); }judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl (5)
81-83: Ensure consistent styling for buttons.
In lines 81-83, the
Backbutton hasbuttonStyle = "text"and an icon"arrow-left". Other buttons, like theAddbutton, usebuttonStyle = "contained".For a consistent user experience, consider using the same
buttonStylefor all action buttons unless there's a specific reason for the difference.
6-302: Consider abstracting repeated patterns to reduce code duplication.
Throughout the file, there are numerous instances where similar code patterns are repeated, such as setting IDs, names, and labels.
To improve maintainability, you might abstract common patterns into helper functions or methods. This can reduce code duplication and make future updates easier.
161-161: Ensure consistency in accessing
posproperty.In line 161, you assign
t.~pos = s.~pos;. Check ifs.~posis correctly defined and whether bothsandtshould be using the tilde in~pos. Inconsistent usage might lead to errors.If
~posis not a special property, update it for consistency:-t.~pos = s.~pos; +t.pos = s.pos;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
177-177: Review the use of backticks around
primitive.In line 177, backticks are used:
m.referenceType.\primitive`.isDefined(). Verify that this is the correct syntax in ETL for accessing theprimitive` property. Incorrect usage may cause syntax errors.If backticks are unnecessary, remove them:
-var columns = rowDeclaration.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration) and m.referenceType.`primitive`.isDefined()); +var columns = rowDeclaration.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration) and m.referenceType.primitive.isDefined());Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
126-126: Check the usage of the tilde (
~) in property assignmentt.~pos.In line 126,
t.~pos = 0;uses a tilde in the property name. Confirm whether this is the correct syntax in ETL for accessing or defining a special property. Misuse might lead to syntax errors or unexpected behavior.If the tilde is not necessary, consider removing it:
-t.~pos = 0; +t.pos = 0;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/test/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/tatami/jsl/jsl2ui/application/JslModel2UiNavigationTest.java (4)
199-199: Ensure Consistent Use of Icon Names
There is an inconsistency in icon names used across the assertions:
- At lines 199 and 215, the icon name is
"visibility".- At lines 239 and 256, the icon name is
"eye".For consistency and to prevent potential errors, it's recommended to use the same icon name throughout the test. Please verify which icon name is correct based on the application's icon set.
Apply this diff to standardize the icon names (assuming
"visibility"is the correct icon):- assertEquals("eye", openButton.getIcon().getIconName()); + assertEquals("visibility", openButton.getIcon().getIconName()); - assertEquals("eye", myJumperOpenButton.getIcon().getIconName()); + assertEquals("visibility", myJumperOpenButton.getIcon().getIconName());Also applies to: 215-215, 239-239, 256-256
50-314: Consider Refactoring the 'testNavigation' Method for Readability
The
testNavigationmethod spans over 250 lines, which can make it difficult to read and maintain. Consider refactoring the test into smaller, more focused methods or using helper methods to improve readability and maintainability.
263-286: Possible Redundant Null Checks on 'findFirst().orElse(null)'
In several places,
findFirst().orElse(null)is used, followed by methods calls that might throw aNullPointerExceptionif the result isnull. Since these are tests, it's better to useorElseThrow()to immediately signal missing expected elements.Apply this diff to replace
orElse(null)withorElseThrow():- assertEquals(pages.stream().filter(p -> p.getName().equals("NavigationTestModel::UserView::level1::related::ViewPage")).findFirst().orElse(null), relatedOpenPageActionDefinition.getTargetPageDefinition()); + assertEquals(pages.stream().filter(p -> p.getName().equals("NavigationTestModel::UserView::level1::related::ViewPage")).findFirst().orElseThrow(), relatedOpenPageActionDefinition.getTargetPageDefinition());Repeat similar changes for other occurrences.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
58-59: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Include
numericField inUserTransferThe
numericfield in theUserentity is not present in theUserTransfer, and it does not appear to be used in any transfer definitions or views. To ensure consistency and proper data handling, consider adding thenumericfield to theUserTransferif it is required for data transfer or UI operations.
- Review the necessity of the
numericfield in data transfers and UI components.- If required, update the
UserTransferto include thenumericfield.Analysis chain
Field 'numeric' in 'User' Entity Not Included in 'UserTransfer'
The
Userentity defines anumericfield at lines 58-59, but this field is not included in theUserTransferdefined at lines 64-67. If thenumericfield is essential for data transfer or used in the UI, consider adding it to theUserTransfer.Run the following script to check if the
numericfield is used elsewhere in transfers or views:Also applies to: 64-67
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of 'numeric' field in transfers and views. # Search for 'numeric' field in transfer definitions rg --type-add 'jsl:.jsl' 'field\s+Integer\s+numeric\s+<=' # Search for usage of 'numeric' field in views rg --type-add 'jsl:.jsl' 'widget\s+Integer\s+numeric\s+<='Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for usage of 'numeric' field in the codebase. # Search for 'numeric' in any transfer or view definitions across all relevant file types rg 'numeric' --type-add 'jsl:*.jsl' --type-add 'java:*.java' --type-add 'xml:*.xml' --type-add 'json:*.json' --type-add 'yml:*.yml' --type-add 'yaml:*.yaml' # Search for 'numeric' within method names or annotations rg '.*numeric.*' --type-add 'jsl:*.jsl' --type-add 'java:*.java' --type-add 'xml:*.xml' --type-add 'json:*.json' --type-add 'yml:*.yml' --type-add 'yaml:*.yaml'Length of output: 25543
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/rowDeclaration.etl (5)
373-383: Undefined reference to
TableTableAddSelectorActionDefinitionIn the
TableTableOpenAddSelectorActionDefinitionrule (lines 373-383),t.selectorForreferencess.equivalent("TableTableAddSelectorActionDefinition"). However,TableTableAddSelectorActionDefinitionis not defined in this file or referenced elsewhere. Please ensure that this rule is defined or included to prevent runtime errors.
170-181: Refactor repetitive button creation code
The code for creating buttons in multiple rules (e.g.,
TableTableFilterButton,TableTableRefreshButton,TableTableOpenCreateButton,TableOpenPageButton,TableRowDeleteButton,TableTableOpenAddSelectorButton,TableTableBulkRemoveButton,TableTableClearButton) follows a similar pattern. Consider abstracting the common functionality into a reusable function or template to enhance maintainability and reduce duplication.For example, you might create a generic button creation rule that accepts parameters for
name,icon,label,style, andactionDefinition.Also applies to: 206-217, 241-253, 277-289, 313-325, 349-361, 386-398, 424-436
255-263: Correct the log message to match the rule name
In the
TableTableOpenCreateButtonIconrule (lines 255-263), the log message on line 262 refers to"TableTableFilterButtonIcon"instead of"TableTableOpenCreateButtonIcon". This appears to be a copy-paste error. Please update the log message to correctly reflect the rule name.Apply this diff to fix the log message:
- log.debug("TableTableFilterButtonIcon: " + t.name); + log.debug("TableTableOpenCreateButtonIcon: " + t.name);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.rule TableTableOpenCreateButtonIcon transform s: JSL!UIRowDeclaration to t: UI!ui::Icon { t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/TableTableOpenCreateButtonIcon"); t.name = s.name + "OpenCreateIcon"; t.iconName = "file-document-plus"; log.debug("TableTableOpenCreateButtonIcon: " + t.name); }
112-120: Handle empty or undefined
primitiveFieldsIn the loop starting at line 114,
primitiveFieldsis used to add columns and filters. IfprimitiveFieldsis empty or undefined, this might cause issues. Consider adding a check to ensure thatprimitiveFieldshas elements before iterating over it.Apply this diff to add a guard clause:
+ if not primitiveFields.isEmpty() then for (field in primitiveFields) { var col = field.equivalentDiscriminated("RowColumnDeclarationPrimitiveColumn", id); t.columns.add(col); if (col.attributeType.isFilterable) { t.filters.add(field.equivalentDiscriminated("RowColumnDeclarationPrimitiveColumnFilter", id)); } } + }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var primitiveFields = s.members.select(m | m.transferField.isDefined() and m.transferField.target.referenceType.`primitive`.isDefined()); if not primitiveFields.isEmpty() then for (field in primitiveFields) { var col = field.equivalentDiscriminated("RowColumnDeclarationPrimitiveColumn", id); t.columns.add(col); if (col.attributeType.isFilterable) { t.filters.add(field.equivalentDiscriminated("RowColumnDeclarationPrimitiveColumnFilter", id)); } } }
403-406: > [!TIP]
Codebase Verification
Duplicate Icon Names Found for Different Actions
The icon name
"link-off"is used for multiple actions, which may lead to user confusion. Consider using distinct icons to differentiate between the "Remove" and "Clear" actions for a better user experience.Affected files:
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/rowDeclaration.etljudo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etlAnalysis chain
Verify the use of identical icon names for different actions
Both
TableTableBulkRemoveButtonIcon(lines 403-406) andTableTableClearButtonIcon(lines 439-444) havet.iconNameset to"link-off". If this is intentional, please disregard. Otherwise, consider using different icons to distinguish between the "Remove" and "Clear" actions for better user experience.To confirm the usage of icons across the codebase, run the following script:
This script will help verify if the icon names are appropriately assigned and whether any duplicates need attention.
Also applies to: 439-444
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of icon names in button icon definitions. # Search for icon definitions and list their icon names. rg --type-add 'etl' -A 2 'transform.*Icon' | rg 't\.iconName'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of icon names in button icon definitions. # Add the 'etl' file type with the correct glob pattern. rg --type-add 'etl:*.etl' --type etl 'transform.*Icon' -A 2 | rg 't\.iconName'Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of icon names in button icon definitions across all .etl files. # Add the 'etl' file type with the correct glob pattern and search for all t.iconName assignments. rg --type-add 'etl:*.etl' --type etl 't\.iconName\s*='Length of output: 4857
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (1)
100-103: Duplicate
setIdCall inColumnIconRuleThe
t.setId(...)method is called twice in theColumnIconrule (lines 100 and 103). This redundancy may lead to confusion or unintended behavior, as the second call overrides the first one.Please remove the duplicate
setIdcall to prevent potential issues. Apply this diff to fix the problem:t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ColumnIcon"); t.iconName = s.getIconModifier().value.value; t.name = s.name + "FieldIcon"; -log.debug("ColumnIcon: " + t.name); -t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ColumnIcon"); +log.debug("ColumnIcon: " + t.name);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/test/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/tatami/jsl/jsl2ui/application/JslModel2UiDataTest.java (4)
50-262: Tests are Comprehensive but Consider Refactoring for Maintainability
The
testBasicData()method thoroughly tests various data types and their attributes, ensuring correct parsing and validation of the model. However, the method spans over 200 lines, which can hinder readability and maintainability. Consider breaking down the test into smaller, focused test methods or extracting reusable assertions into helper methods.
346-656: Refactor Large Test Method for Improved Readability
The
testRelations()method is extensive, spanning over 300 lines. This length can make the test difficult to read, understand, and maintain. Consider refactoring the method by:
- Splitting it into multiple smaller test methods, each focusing on a specific aspect of the relations.
- Extracting common assertion logic into helper methods or utility classes.
- Organizing the test into sections with clear comments or annotations for better navigation.
658-674: Optimize
AttributeAssertionClass UsageThe
AttributeAssertioninner class serves as a utility for asserting attribute types. To enhance reusability and maintainability:
- Consider moving
AttributeAssertionto a separate utility class if it's or could be used across multiple test classes.- If it remains as an inner class, evaluate if it can be made static to avoid unnecessary coupling with the enclosing class instance.
676-685: Simplify
assertRelationTypeMethod ParametersThe
assertRelationTypemethod has a long parameter list, which can reduce readability and increase the possibility of errors when calling the method. To improve this:
- Encapsulate the parameters into a builder or a data transfer object (DTO) that represents the relation type's expected state.
- This approach can make the test code cleaner and more maintainable by making the assertions more descriptive and less error-prone.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/test/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/tatami/jsl/jsl2ui/application/JslModel2UiWidgetsTest.java (3)
51-362: Refactor
testBasicWidgetsMethod for Better MaintainabilityThe
testBasicWidgetsmethod is quite lengthy and contains deeply nested assertions. Consider refactoring this test into smaller, focused methods or extracting helper functions to improve readability and maintainability.
156-158: Extract Repeated Code into Helper Method
The logic for finding a
PageContainerby name is repeated multiple times. To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider extracting this logic into a helper method.Example:
private PageContainer findPageContainerByName(List<PageContainer> pageContainers, String name) { return pageContainers.stream() .filter(c -> c.getName().equals(name)) .findFirst() .orElseThrow(); } // Usage: PageContainer dashboard = findPageContainerByName(pageContainers, "BasicWidgetsTestModel::WidgetsApp::Dashboard"); PageContainer userView = findPageContainerByName(pageContainers, "BasicWidgetsTestModel::UserView::View::PageContainer"); PageContainer userForm = findPageContainerByName(pageContainers, "BasicWidgetsTestModel::UserForm::Create::PageContainer");
363-774: Refactor
testRelationWidgetsMethod for Better MaintainabilityThe
testRelationWidgetsmethod is extensive and includes complex and nested assertions. Breaking it down into smaller test methods or utilizing helper functions could enhance readability and make the test suite easier to maintain.
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/data/transferFieldDeclaration.eol
Show resolved
Hide resolved
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/rowColumnDeclaration.eol
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/rowDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationViewPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/id.eol (2)
34-37: Consider a more descriptive name for the operation.The implementation of the
purifyoperation is correct and serves its purpose well. However, the name "purify" might not be the most descriptive for its specific function of replacing "::" with "/".Consider renaming the operation to something more specific, such as
replaceColonWithSlashornormalizeForXmiId. This would make the operation's purpose immediately clear to other developers.-operation String purify() : String { +operation String normalizeForXmiId() : String { // e.g. xmiids do not like such characters return self.replace("::", "/"); }
35-35: Enhance the documentation for better clarity.While the current comment provides some context, it could be more comprehensive to improve maintainability.
Consider expanding the comment to provide more details about why this operation is necessary and when it should be used. For example:
- // e.g. xmiids do not like such characters + // Replace '::' with '/' to ensure compatibility with xmiids. + // xmiids (XML Metadata Interchange IDs) have restrictions on allowed characters. + // This operation should be called before using a string as an xmiid.judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/type/type.etl (1)
Line range hint
1-144: Overall assessment: Consistent and beneficial changes across all rules.The changes made to this file demonstrate a systematic approach to improving ID generation for all data types. The consistent addition of the
purify()method tos.getId()across all rules enhances the robustness of the transformation process.To ensure the completeness of this change:
- Verify that the
purify()method is properly defined and implemented in the codebase.- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
purify()method, either in this file or where the method is defined.- If similar transformations exist in other files, ensure that this change has been applied consistently across the entire codebase.
Consider documenting this change in the project's changelog or documentation, explaining the rationale behind the introduction of the
purify()method and its impact on ID generation.judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (1)
Line range hint
1-524: Summary of changes and potential impactsThis file has undergone significant refactoring, primarily focusing on the following areas:
- ID generation: Updated across all rules to use
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.name.- Guard conditions and transform statements: Modified in several rules, potentially affecting which elements are transformed.
- @lazy annotations: Added to some rules, which may impact when these rules are executed.
- targetType assignments: Updated in action definition rules to use
transferRelation.target.referenceType.- Conditional button additions: Enhanced in button group rules, providing more dynamic functionality.
These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to improve consistency and functionality. However, they may have far-reaching impacts on the system's behavior and performance.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure all ID references throughout the codebase are updated to reflect the new generation method.
- Review the impact of @lazy annotations on rule execution order and performance.
- Verify that the new conditional button logic aligns with the intended user experience.
- Consider adding comprehensive unit tests to cover the new conditional logic and ensure proper functionality of all modified rules.
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect these architectural changes, especially regarding the shift from
actorDeclarationtorootMenuas the primary context.judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (2)
22-22: Reminder: Address the TODO comment for additional mask attributesThere's a TODO comment indicating that the implementation of additional mask attributes is pending. Completing this will ensure that the link fully supports all required features.
Would you like assistance in implementing the additional mask attributes? I can help with this or open a GitHub issue to track the task.
148-150: Inconsistent usage of icon assignment methodsThere is an inconsistency in how icons are assigned to
t.iconandt.iconName:
- In lines 148-150 and 185-187,
t.iconNameis assigned a string value directly.- In lines 245-247 and 271-273,
t.iconis assigned usingcreateSyntheticIcon.For consistency and maintainability, consider standardizing the icon assignment method. This helps prevent confusion and potential errors in icon rendering.
Also applies to: 185-187, 245-247, 271-273
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/id.eol (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/type/type.etl (9 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (15 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (26 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl
Additional comments not posted (24)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/id.eol (1)
34-37: Clarify the intended usage of thepurifyoperation.The new
purifyoperation seems to be related to ID management, but its connection to the existingsetIdandgetIdoperations is not explicit.To ensure proper integration and usage, please clarify:
- Where and when should this operation be called in relation to
setIdandgetId?- Are there any other files or operations that will use this new functionality?
Consider adding a usage example in the comments to illustrate how this operation fits into the broader ID management process.
To verify the intended usage, we can search for potential uses of this operation:
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/type/type.etl (9)
22-22: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()is consistent with the previous rule, maintaining a uniform approach to ID sanitization across different data types.
35-35: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()maintains consistency with the previous rules, ensuring a standardized approach to ID sanitization for the TimeType.
48-48: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()continues the pattern established in previous rules, ensuring consistent ID sanitization for the TimestampType.
59-59: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()maintains the established pattern, ensuring consistent ID sanitization for the EnumerationType.
70-70: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()continues the consistent approach to ID sanitization, this time applied to EnumerationMember.
83-83: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()maintains the established pattern of ID sanitization, now applied to the BooleanType.
96-96: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()continues the uniform approach to ID sanitization, this time applied to the StringType.
129-129: Approve the consistent use ofpurify()method and summarize the impact.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()in the CreateBinaryType rule completes the consistent application of this change across all data type creation rules in the file.This systematic update enhances the robustness of ID generation for all data types, potentially preventing issues related to invalid characters in IDs. The consistency of this change across all rules is commendable, as it ensures a uniform approach to ID sanitization throughout the transformation process.
7-7: Approve the addition ofpurify()method.The addition of
purify()method tos.getId()is a good practice. It likely sanitizes the ID, preventing potential issues with invalid characters.To ensure consistency, let's verify if
purify()is a defined method:judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (13)
111-113: LGTM: TablePrimitiveColumnFilter rule updatesThe changes to the TablePrimitiveColumnFilter rule are consistent with the previous modifications:
- The transform statement now uses
JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration.- The ID generation has been updated to use
rootMenu.name.These changes align with the overall refactoring pattern in this file.
239-239: LGTM: ViewTableDeclarationFilterButton ID generation updateThe ID generation for the ViewTableDeclarationFilterButton has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with the overall refactoring pattern in this file.
253-253: LGTM: ViewTableDeclarationFilterButtonIcon ID generation updateThe ID generation for the ViewTableDeclarationFilterButtonIcon has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with the overall refactoring pattern in this file.
275-275: LGTM: ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButton ID generation updateThe ID generation for the ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButton has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with the overall refactoring pattern in this file.
289-289: LGTM: ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButtonIcon ID generation updateThe ID generation for the ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButtonIcon has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with the overall refactoring pattern in this file.
300-302: Verify targetType assignment in ViewTableDeclarationRefreshActionDefinitionThe ViewTableDeclarationRefreshActionDefinition rule has been updated:
- The ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.- The
targetTypeassignment has been changed to uses.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType").These changes are consistent with the modifications made to the ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinition rule.
To ensure the new
targetTypeassignment is correct and consistent, please run the following verification:Verification successful
TargetType Assignment Verified Successfully
All instances of
targetTypeare consistently assigned usings.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType")across the relevant.etlfiles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Compare the targetType assignments in FilterActionDefinition and RefreshActionDefinition rg --type etl 'targetType\s*=.*transferRelation\.target\.referenceType' .Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for targetType assignments in .etl files rg -g "*.etl" 'targetType\s*=\s*.*\.transferRelation\.target\.referenceType\.equivalent\("ClassType"\)' .Length of output: 3135
219-228: Verify new conditional button additions in InlineViewTableRowButtonGroupThe InlineViewTableRowButtonGroup rule has been updated with the following changes:
- The ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.- New conditional button additions have been implemented:
- View button (if update view modifier is defined)
- Delete button (if delete is allowed for the transfer relation target)
These changes enhance the row-level actions based on specific conditions.
To ensure these new conditions are correctly implemented, please run the following verifications:
344-354: Verify impact of @lazy annotation and button style change in ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonThe ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButton rule has been updated with several changes:
- The rule is now marked as @lazy.
- The ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.- The button style has been changed to "contained".
While the ID generation change is consistent with previous modifications, the @lazy annotation and button style change require verification.
To ensure these changes don't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verifications:
Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using the @lazy annotation on this rule.
Verification successful
Verified: @lazy annotation and "contained" button style changes are consistent and do not introduce issues.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other @lazy annotations on button rules rg --type etl '@lazy.*rule.*Button' . # Check for other uses of "contained" button style rg --type etl 'buttonStyle\s*=\s*"contained"' .Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other @lazy annotations on button rules in .etl files rg '@lazy.*rule.*Button' -g '*.etl' . # Check for other uses of "contained" button style in .etl files rg 'buttonStyle\s*=\s*"contained"' -g '*.etl' .Length of output: 2264
264-266: Verify targetType assignment in ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinitionThe ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinition rule has been updated:
- The ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.- The
targetTypeassignment has been changed to uses.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType").While the ID generation change is consistent with previous modifications, the
targetTypeassignment change requires verification.To ensure the new
targetTypeassignment is correct, please run the following verification:
358-365: Verify impact of @lazy annotation in ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonIconThe ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonIcon rule has been updated:
- The rule is now marked as @lazy.
- The ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.While the ID generation change is consistent with previous modifications, the @lazy annotation requires verification.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using the @lazy annotation on this rule.
26-26: Verify the impact of ID generation change for TableIconThe ID generation for TableIcon has been updated to use
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.name. This change is consistent with the modifications in the AbstractViewTableDeclaration rule but may affect how icons are identified and referenced in the system.To ensure this change doesn't break existing references, please run the following verification:
Verification successful
Re-check References to TableIcon IDs in
.etlFilesThe previous search for
TableIconreferences failed due to an unrecognized file type. Let's target.etlfiles directly to ensure all references are checked.[/run_scripts]
Further Verify External References to
TableIconTwo references to
TableIconhave been found in.etlfiles. To ensure that the ID generation change does not disrupt any external references, please run the following verification:[/run_scripts]
ID Generation Change for
TableIconVerifiedAll references to
TableIconare contained withinviewTableDeclaration.etl. The update to userootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.nameis localized and does not impact other parts of the system.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing references to TableIcon IDs that might be affected rg --type etl 'TableIcon"?\)' .Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any existing references to TableIcon IDs in .etl files rg 'TableIcon"?\)' --glob "*.etl" .Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all references to TableIcon across the entire repository rg 'TableIcon' .Length of output: 585
80-82: Verify the impact of TablePrimitiveColumn rule changesThe TablePrimitiveColumn rule has been updated:
- The transform statement now uses
JSL!UIRowColumnDeclarationinstead of the previous type.- The ID generation has been changed to use
rootMenu.name.These changes suggest a modification in the source model structure and are consistent with previous ID generation changes.
To ensure these changes don't break existing functionality, please run the following verification:
Verification successful
Verified: No issues found with the TablePrimitiveColumn rule changes
The search confirmed that there are no existing references to
JSL!UIRowColumnDeclarationwithin the.etlfiles, indicating that the transformation changes are appropriately isolated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any references to the old transform type that might need updating rg --type etl 'transform.*:.*UIRowColumnDeclaration' .Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration within .etl files rg 'transform\s*:\s*JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration' --type-add 'etl:*.etl' --type etl .Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all .etl files in the repository fd --extension etl # If .etl files are found, search for any transform statements within them rg 'transform\s*:\s*' --type-add 'etl:*.etl' --type etl .Length of output: 7734
5-8: Verify the impact of guard condition change and new relationName assignmentThe guard condition has been updated to use
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s)instead of checkingactorDeclaration. This change may affect which elements are transformed by this rule. Additionally, a newrelationNameassignment has been added.To ensure these changes don't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (1)
97-100: Verify the use of the same condition for adding different buttonsIn lines 97-100, the condition
s.getSelectorTableModifier().isDefined()is used to add both theViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorButtonand theViewLinkDeclarationUnsetButton. Please verify if this is intentional. If different conditions are required for each button, consider adjusting accordingly.
...-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/actor/actorGroupDeclaration.eol (2)
10-19: LGTM: Well-implemented getRootMenu() operationThe new
getRootMenu()operation effectively traverses the container hierarchy to find the root menu. It correctly handles both nested groups and direct menu containers.Consider a minor optimization to reduce nesting:
@cached operation JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration getRootMenu(): JSL!UIMenuDeclaration { - if (self.eContainer.isDefined()) { - if (self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { - return self.eContainer.getRootMenu(); - } else if (self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuDeclaration)) { - return self.eContainer; - } + if (not self.eContainer.isDefined()) { + return null; + } + if (self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)) { + return self.eContainer.getRootMenu(); + } + if (self.eContainer.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuDeclaration)) { + return self.eContainer; } return null; }This change reduces nesting and makes the logic more straightforward.
31-52: LGTM: Well-implemented getExposedVisualElements() operationThe new
getExposedVisualElements()operation effectively collects visual elements from the current group and its members, including links, tables, and nested groups. The implementation is thorough and handles different types of members appropriately.Consider a minor optimization to reduce code duplication:
@cached operation JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration getExposedVisualElements(): Set { var ves = new Set(); ves.add(self); - for (link in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.add(link); - ves.addAll(link.getExposedVisualElements()); - } - - for (table in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.add(table); - ves.addAll(table.getExposedVisualElements()); - } - - for (group in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration)).asSet()) { - ves.add(group); - ves.addAll(group.getExposedVisualElements()); + var memberTypes = Sequence { + JSL!UIMenuLinkDeclaration, + JSL!UIMenuTableDeclaration, + JSL!UIMenuGroupDeclaration + }; + + for (memberType in memberTypes) { + for (member in self.members.select(m | m.isTypeOf(memberType)).asSet()) { + ves.add(member); + ves.addAll(member.getExposedVisualElements()); + } } return ves; }This refactoring reduces code duplication and makes it easier to add new member types in the future if needed.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/actor/actorGroupDeclaration.eol (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/menuDeclaration.eol (2 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewGroupDeclaration.eol (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationTablePage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/menuDeclaration.eol
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/ui/viewGroupDeclaration.eol
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/menuTableDeclarationTablePage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationAddSelectorPage.etl
Additional comments not posted (2)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/operations/jsl/actor/actorGroupDeclaration.eol (2)
2-6: LGTM: Improved getFqName() implementationThe updated
getFqName()operation correctly handles the hierarchical structure of menu groups and menus. It constructs the fully qualified name by recursively appending the container's name, which is an improvement over the previous hardcoded approach.
22-28: LGTM: Improved getActorDeclaration() implementationThe updated
getActorDeclaration()operation effectively utilizes the newgetRootMenu()method to retrieve the actor declaration. This approach is more robust and maintainable compared to the previous implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (15 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (26 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl (1 hunks)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/test/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/tatami/jsl/jsl2ui/application/JslModel2UiWidgetsTest.java (2 hunks)
- pom.xml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationFormPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationSetSelectorPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclarationViewPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationFormPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclarationViewPage.etl
- judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/test/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/tatami/jsl/jsl2ui/application/JslModel2UiWidgetsTest.java
- pom.xml
🔇 Additional comments not posted (30)
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl (11)
39-39: Approve change in LinkIcon ruleThe modification to use
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namein thesetIdmethod is consistent with the changes observed in the AbstractViewLinkDeclaration rule. This change maintains consistency across the file.
75-75: Approve change in ViewLinkDeclarationRefreshActionDefinition ruleThe modification to use
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namein thesetIdmethod is consistent with the changes observed in other rules. This change maintains consistency across the file.
306-314: Approve addition of ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteRangeActionDefinition ruleThis new rule complements the ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteRangeAction rule by providing the necessary action definition:
- It uses
rootMenu.namefor ID generation, consistent with other rules.- It sets up an AutocompleteRangeActionDefinition with appropriate properties.
- It defines the target type using
s.transferRelation.target.referenceType.The addition of this rule completes the autocomplete range functionality and follows the patterns established in other rules.
331-339: Approve addition of ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetActionDefinition ruleThis new rule complements the ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction rule by providing the necessary action definition:
- It uses
rootMenu.namefor ID generation, consistent with other rules.- It sets up an AutocompleteSetActionDefinition with appropriate properties.
- It defines the target type using
s.transferRelation.target.referenceType.The addition of this rule completes the autocomplete set functionality and follows the patterns established in other rules.
Line range hint
134-261: Approve consistent changes across button and action definition rulesThe modifications in these rules (ViewLinkDeclarationOpenPageButton, ViewLinkDeclarationOpenPageActionDefinition, ViewLinkDeclarationOpenFormButton, ViewLinkDeclarationOpenCreateFormActionDefinition, ViewLinkDeclarationDeleteButton, ViewLinkDeclarationRowDeleteActionDefinition, ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetButton, ViewLinkDeclarationUnsetActionDefinition, ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorButton, ViewLinkDeclarationOpenSetSelectorActionDefinition) are consistent with the overall changes in the file:
- All
setIdmethods now userootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.name.- Some rules now use
s.transferRelation.target.referenceTypeinstead ofs.referenceType.These changes align with the new structure and maintain consistency across the file.
To ensure these changes are applied consistently, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to actorDeclaration.name rg --type etl 'actorDeclaration\.name' . # Check for usage of transferRelation.target.referenceType rg --type etl 'transferRelation\.target\.referenceType' .This will help identify any inconsistencies in the changes across related files.
293-302: Approve addition of ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteRangeAction ruleThis new rule introduces functionality for autocomplete range actions:
- It uses
rootMenu.namefor ID generation, consistent with other rules.- It sets up an action with an associated action definition.
- It defines owner and target data elements.
The addition of this rule enhances the autocomplete functionality and follows the patterns established in other rules.
To ensure this new rule integrates well with existing code, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of AutocompleteRangeAction and related classes rg --type etl 'AutocompleteRangeAction' . rg --type etl 'AutocompleteRangeActionDefinition' .This will help identify any potential conflicts or inconsistencies with the new autocomplete range action functionality across related files.
318-327:⚠️ Potential issueApprove addition of ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction rule with a note on consistency
This new rule introduces functionality for autocomplete set actions:
- It sets up an action with an associated action definition.
- It defines owner and target data elements.
The addition of this rule enhances the autocomplete functionality. However, there's an inconsistency in naming:
The ID generation and debug log message include a 'T' prefix (
TViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction), which is inconsistent with other rules. This might be a typo.Please update the following lines:
- t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/TViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction"); + t.setId(rootMenu.name + "/(jsl/" + s.getId() + ")/ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction"); - log.debug("TViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction: " + t.name); + log.debug("ViewLinkDeclarationAutocompleteSetAction: " + t.name);After making these changes, please run the following script to ensure consistency:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining 'T' prefixes in action names rg --type etl 'T[A-Z][a-zA-Z]+Action' .This will help identify any other instances of inconsistent naming across related files.
Line range hint
46-64: Approve changes in InlineViewLink rule with verificationThe modifications in this rule are consistent with the overall changes in the file:
- Using
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namefor ID generation.- Setting
dataElementusings.transferRelation.target.- Updated condition for adding
refreshActionDefinition.These changes align with the new structure and provide more precise control over when the refresh action is included.
To ensure these changes don't introduce unexpected behavior, please run the following script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in the changes across the file and related files.
✅ Verification successful
Verified the removal of
actorDeclarationand appropriate usage of refresh conditions.
- No references to
actorDeclarationremain inviewLinkDeclaration.etl.- Updated conditions using
isRefreshAllowed()andisEager()are correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to actorDeclaration in this file rg --type etl 'actorDeclaration' judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl # Check for usage of isRefreshAllowed() and isEager() methods rg --type etl 'isRefreshAllowed\(\)' . rg --type etl 'isEager\(\)' .Length of output: 575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to actorDeclaration in the specific file rg 'actorDeclaration' -g "*.etl" judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewLinkDeclaration.etl # Check for usage of isRefreshAllowed() method across all .etl files rg 'isRefreshAllowed\(\)' -g "*.etl" . # Check for usage of isEager() method across all .etl files rg 'isEager\(\)' -g "*.etl" .Length of output: 6132
86-100: Approve changes in InlineViewLinkButtonGroup rule with verificationThe modifications in this rule align with the overall changes in the file:
- Using
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namefor ID generation.- Updated conditions for adding various buttons, now using
s.transferRelation.targetand specific modifiers.These changes provide more precise control over when each button is included in the button group.
To ensure these changes don't introduce unexpected behavior, please run the following script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in the usage of these methods across related files and ensure that the new conditions are applied consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: InlineViewLinkButtonGroup rule changes are consistent
The modifications in the
InlineViewLinkButtonGrouprule have been verified for consistency across the codebase:
- Usage of
getCreateFormModifier(),isDeleteAllowed(), andgetSelectorTableModifier()methods is consistent in multiple.etlfiles.- The shift to using
s.transferRelation.targetandrootMenualigns with existing patterns and does not introduce discrepancies.These changes enhance control over button inclusion without affecting other parts of the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of getCreateFormModifier(), isDeleteAllowed(), and getSelectorTableModifier() methods rg --type etl 'getCreateFormModifier\(\)' . rg --type etl 'isDeleteAllowed\(\)' . rg --type etl 'getSelectorTableModifier\(\)' .Length of output: 575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of getCreateFormModifier(), isDeleteAllowed(), and getSelectorTableModifier() methods in .etl files rg 'getCreateFormModifier\(\)' --glob '*.etl' . rg 'isDeleteAllowed\(\)' --glob '*.etl' . rg 'getSelectorTableModifier\(\)' --glob '*.etl' .Length of output: 12238
5-22:⚠️ Potential issueReview changes in AbstractViewLinkDeclaration rule
The modifications in this rule suggest a shift in how view links are processed:
- The guard condition now uses
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s)instead of checking relations. This change might affect which elements are transformed.- The
relationNameandisEagerproperties are now derived froms.transferRelation.targetinstead of directly froms. This change aligns with the new structure but ensure it doesn't break existing functionality.- There's a TODO comment regarding additional mask attributes. This should be addressed in future updates.
To ensure these changes don't introduce regressions, please run the following script:
The TODO comment needs to be addressed. Consider creating a separate task to implement the additional mask attributes.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All outdated references in
viewLinkDeclaration.etlhave been removed as expected. No lingering issues were found in the specified lines.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any references to the old condition or property access rg --type etl 'actorDeclaration\.getAllRelations\(\)\.contains\(s\)' . rg --type etl 's\.isEager\(\)' .Length of output: 575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the old guard condition in .etl files rg 'actorDeclaration\.getAllRelations\(\)\.contains\(s\)' --glob '*.etl' # Search for references to the old isEager() property access in .etl files rg 's\.isEager\(\)' --glob '*.etl'Length of output: 2647
111-113: Approve changes in ViewLinkDeclarationRepresentationColumn rule with verificationThe modifications in this rule are consistent with the overall changes and introduce a new dynamic approach:
- Using
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namefor ID generation.- Introduction of
firstStringFromTargetto dynamically find the first string field from the relation target.These changes align with the new structure and provide a more flexible way to determine the representation column.
To ensure the new logic for finding the first string field works as expected, please run the following script:
This will help identify any potential issues with the new logic for determining the representation column across related files.
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following script to verify the usage of
getAllPrimitiveFields()andreferenceType.primitive == "string"in.etlfiles:
Please run the following script to accurately verify the usage of
referenceType.primitive == "string"in.etlfiles, accounting for potential backticks aroundprimitive:
Please run the following script to accurately verify the usage of
referenceType.primitive== "string"in.etlfiles:
Verified changes in ViewLinkDeclarationRepresentationColumn rule
The modifications are consistent with existing patterns in the codebase:
- ID Generation: Using
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.namealigns with similar implementations across other modules.- Dynamic Field Retrieval: The introduction of
firstStringFromTargetleverages established methods for dynamically determining the representation column.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of getAllPrimitiveFields() and related methods rg --type etl 'getAllPrimitiveFields\(\)' . rg --type etl 'referenceType\.primitive == "string"' .Length of output: 575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of getAllPrimitiveFields() in .etl files rg 'getAllPrimitiveFields\(\)' --glob '*.etl' # Search for referenceType.primitive == "string" in .etl files rg 'referenceType\.primitive == "string"' --glob '*.etl'Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for referenceType.primitive == "string" with optional backticks in .etl files rg 'referenceType[`]?\.primitive[`]? == "string"' --glob '*.etl'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for referenceType.`primitive` == "string" in .etl files rg 'referenceType\.`primitive`\s*==\s*"string"' --glob '*.etl'Length of output: 687
judo-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl (19)
26-26: LGTM: Consistent ID generation updateThe change to use
rootMenu.namein the ID generation is consistent with the overall pattern in this file. This update ensures that the IDs are generated uniformly across different rules.
111-113: LGTM: Consistent updates in TablePrimitiveColumnFilter ruleThe TablePrimitiveColumnFilter rule has been updated consistently with the TablePrimitiveColumn and ColumnIcon rules:
- It now transforms
JSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration.- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.These changes maintain consistency across related rules.
219-228: LGTM: Consistent updates in InlineViewTableRowButtonGroup ruleThe InlineViewTableRowButtonGroup rule has been updated consistently with other rules:
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name.- Conditional button additions have been implemented, similar to those in the InlineViewTableButtonGroup rule.
These changes maintain consistency and enhance the functionality of the row button group.
239-239: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationFilterButtonThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationFilterButton rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with the changes in other rules throughout the file.
253-253: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationFilterButtonIconThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationFilterButtonIcon rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, maintaining consistency with the changes in other rules throughout the file.
275-275: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButtonThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButton rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which aligns with the changes made in other rules throughout the file.
289-289: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButtonIconThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationRefreshButtonIcon rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, maintaining consistency with the changes in other rules throughout the file.
300-302: LGTM: Consistent updates in ViewTableDeclarationRefreshActionDefinitionThe ViewTableDeclarationRefreshActionDefinition rule has been updated:
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.- The
targetTypeassignment has been changed tos.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType").These changes are consistent with the updates made in the ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinition rule.
Please refer to the verification script provided in the ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinition review comment to check for any unintended side effects of the
targetTypeassignment change.
311-311: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateButtonThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateButton rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which aligns with the changes made in other rules throughout the file.
325-325: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateButtonIconThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateButtonIcon rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, maintaining consistency with the changes in other rules throughout the file.
336-336: LGTM: Consistent ID generation update in ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateActionDefinitionThe ID generation in the ViewTableDeclarationOpenCreateActionDefinition rule has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which aligns with the changes made in other rules throughout the file.
343-353: Verify the impact of button style change in ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonThe ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButton rule has been updated:
- The rule is now marked as @lazy, consistent with other rules.
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.- The button style has been changed to "contained".
While the first two changes are improvements, the button style change might affect the UI appearance.
Please verify that changing the button style to "contained" is intentional and consistent with the design guidelines. Also, check if this change affects the visual hierarchy of buttons in the UI.
357-364: LGTM: Consistent updates in ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonIconThe ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageButtonIcon rule has been updated:
- The rule is now marked as @lazy, consistent with other rules.
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.These changes maintain consistency with the updates made in other rules throughout the file.
Line range hint
1-523: Summary of changes in viewTableDeclaration.etlThis review has covered multiple changes across various rules in the viewTableDeclaration.etl file. The main themes of these changes are:
- Consistent update of ID generation to use
rootMenu.nameinstead ofactorDeclaration.name.- Addition of @lazy annotations to several rules.
- Updates to
targetTypeassignments in action definition rules.- Modifications to button styles and conditional button additions.
- Simplification of some rule logic, particularly in the InlineViewTable rule.
While most changes appear to be improvements and maintain consistency, there are a few areas that require further verification:
- The impact of the new guard condition using
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s).- The removal of link handling code in the InlineViewTable rule.
- The implementation of new methods used in conditional button additions.
- The consistency of @lazy annotation usage across action definition rules.
Please address the verification requests in the individual review comments to ensure these changes don't introduce unintended side effects.
264-266: Verify the impact of targetType assignment change in ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinitionThe ViewTableDeclarationFilterActionDefinition rule has been updated:
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.- The
targetTypeassignment has been changed tos.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType").While the ID generation change is an improvement, the
targetTypeassignment change might affect the behavior of the filter action.Please run the following script to check for any unintended side effects of the
targetTypeassignment change:#!/bin/bash # Check for other occurrences of transferRelation.target.referenceType rg 'transferRelation\.target\.referenceType' -g '*.etl' # Check for other uses of equivalent("ClassType") rg 'equivalent\("ClassType"\)' -g '*.etl'
368-375: Verify @lazy annotation usage in ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageActionDefinitionThe ViewTableDeclarationOpenPageActionDefinition rule has been updated:
- The rule is now marked as @lazy.
- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.- The
targetTypeassignment has been changed tos.transferRelation.target.referenceType.equivalent("ClassType").While these changes are consistent with updates in other rules, the use of the @lazy annotation should be verified.
Please run the following script to check for other @lazy annotations on action definition rules:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other @lazy annotations on action definition rules rg '@lazy.*rule.*ActionDefinition' -g '*.etl' # Compare the targetType assignments across different action definition rules rg 'targetType\s*=.*transferRelation\.target\.referenceType' -g '*.etl'Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using the @lazy annotation on this rule.
5-8: Verify the impact of the guard condition changeThe guard condition has been updated to use
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s)instead of the previous condition. This change might affect when the rule is applied.The addition of
t.relationName = s.transferRelation.target.name;is a good improvement, providing more context to the transformed element.Please run the following script to check for any unintended side effects of the guard condition change:
✅ Verification successful
Guard Condition and
relationNameAssignment VerifiedAll instances of
containsVisualElementandtransferRelation.target.nameare consistently used across the codebase, ensuring that the recent changes do not introduce any unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of containsVisualElement rg 'containsVisualElement' -g '*.etl' # Search for other uses of transferRelation.target.name rg 'transferRelation\.target\.name' -g '*.etl'Length of output: 5556
35-53: Verify the impact of InlineViewTable rule changesSeveral significant changes have been made to the InlineViewTable rule:
- The guard condition now uses
rootMenu.containsVisualElement(s), consistent with the AbstractViewTableDeclaration rule.- ID generation has been updated to use
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.- The code for handling links has been commented out.
- The column handling logic has been simplified.
While the first two changes are improvements, the removal of link handling and simplification of column handling might impact functionality.
Please run the following script to check for any unintended side effects of these changes:
The commented-out code for link handling should be reviewed to determine if it needs to be reintegrated or if it can be safely removed.
80-82: Verify the impact of TablePrimitiveColumn rule changesThe TablePrimitiveColumn rule has been updated:
- It now transforms
JSL!UIRowColumnDeclarationinstead ofJSL!UIRowColumnDeclaration.- ID generation now uses
rootMenu.name, which is consistent with other rules.The change in the transformed element type might affect which elements this rule is applied to.
Please run the following script to check for any unintended side effects of these changes:
...-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-tatami-jsl-jsl2ui/src/main/epsilon/transformations/ui/modules/view/viewTableDeclaration.etl
Show resolved
Hide resolved
