-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Persist registry ID in block #445
Draft
nbenn
wants to merge
15
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
436-registry-id
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
33424dd
wip registry id
nbenn 1bf682c
fix use of construct_block()
nbenn ae2a2f0
lint fix
nbenn 1333924
introduce generics for input/output
nbenn c0c9987
consider special case of result block in compat check
nbenn f351163
exclude result block further down in stacks
nbenn afacf11
separate are_blocks_compatible()
nbenn cdd0c59
update vignettes + app examples according to registry change
DivadNojnarg 3550c64
update Suggests
DivadNojnarg 61b6fc1
lint + bump version
DivadNojnarg 84cb37a
mention to export methods
DivadNojnarg c40deae
fix duplicated chunk
DivadNojnarg d8c1a62
...
DivadNojnarg 8b597e4
reduce test errors
DivadNojnarg 9fdee97
missing warning
DivadNojnarg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nbenn Spotted a new issue when checking the tests:
Looking at
are_blocks_compatible
, problem is that the stored function insideattr(x, "input")
is anonymous.Code to reproduce:
Then, click on the + button for the first stack.