Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flesh out scenario details #34

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024
Merged

Flesh out scenario details #34

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

zsusswein
Copy link
Collaborator

@zsusswein zsusswein commented Feb 13, 2024

This is a first crack at some of the details we need to get scenarios
started. I made the following big-er judgement calls:

  • Renewal is good enough (vs SEIR)
  • One longer timeseries with crazy dynamics works because of the
    rolling windows
  • Put numbers on the GIs

Closes #22

manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@seabbs seabbs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. I think a bit more evidence and discussion needed for me.

manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This is a first crack at some of the details we need to get scnearios
started. I made the following big-er juddgement calls:
* Renewal is good enough (vs SEIR)
* One longer timeseries with crazy dynamics works because of the
rolling windows
* Put numbers on the GIs

Closes #22
@seabbs seabbs force-pushed the 22-scenario-details branch from 77da0a1 to bbdd39d Compare February 13, 2024 19:36
@seabbs
Copy link
Collaborator

seabbs commented Feb 13, 2024

As discussed today some of the review comments are not appropriate as this is a fleshing out of the skeleton vs a full method write up.

I think we should make the minor correction we can here and then spin out specific issues that can be addressed in their own PRs so we can keep the development cadence up.

@zsusswein give me a ping if there is anything I can help resolve here to get this PR turned around.

manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manuscript/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@seabbs
Copy link
Collaborator

seabbs commented Feb 15, 2024

Where are we on t his?

@seabbs
Copy link
Collaborator

seabbs commented Feb 15, 2024

Nearly ready for another review?

@seabbs seabbs enabled auto-merge February 15, 2024 13:29
@zsusswein
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nearly ready for another review?

Got snowed under by pipeline stuff yesterday. Plan is to turn around this afternoon.

Co-authored-by: Samuel Brand <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@seabbs seabbs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think I have resolved all the key points and made issues of those that remain. I suggest we merge and deal with incremental improvements via issues to avoid this being stuck

@seabbs seabbs merged commit 841a1b8 into main Feb 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@seabbs seabbs deleted the 22-scenario-details branch February 19, 2024 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add simulated scenarios detail to manuscript
3 participants